You are here: IE »   Story

Civil society shares stage to send terror a firm message

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • For a change, the politicians and bureaucrats sat back and listened as artistes, sportspersons and eminent citizens did the talking.

    An event organised by the Home Ministry to express peoples’ solidarity against terror saw a fair sprinkling of politicians and ministers at the India Gate lawns on Sunday.

    But the evening belonged to the large number of prominent personalities from different fields who got together to send out a message against terrorism and express their solidarity with the victims of the 26/11 terror attacks in Mumbai.

    It was the first of a kind event organised by the Home Ministry to mark the first anniversary of the culmination of 26/11 operations.

    Actors Shahrukh Khan and Nandita Das, sports icons Abhinav Bindra and Sania Mirza, renowned musician Dr L Subramaniam and a host of other eminent citizens participated in the event and read out their messages of hope and triumph over terrorism and violence.

    Ads by Google

    Noted author Javed Akhtar read out his latest poem, which, he said, he had written just three days ago, on November 26.

    Artistes Shilpa Rao, Shankar Mahadevan and Kavitha Krishnamurthy also gave short performances.

    Urging people to unite in the fight against terror, Shahrukh Khan said he was sometimes surprised to be asked about his opinion on terror. “Because there can never be two opinions about terror. It has to be rejected in all forms,” he said.

    The Indian Express Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta said the best response to terrorists can only come from the people. He said by indulging in violence, the terrorists were trying to decide how some of us would die and the most apt way to deal with that would be not to allow them to dictate how everyone should live.

    Solidarity against terror: No action, all talkBy: MV | 01-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward The idea of a solidarity rally sounds good but how effective is it? Is it going to scan our airports and railways and beaches for terrorists? The Home Ministry and the government should spend their time more effectively in having undercover operations to find terrorists and break up their operations. This is another way of wasting tax money to do nothing. How about training police officers, giving them good weapons? The New York Times wrote a scathing article that there was no real improvements made in fighting terrorism in Mumbai, a year after the Mumbai attack. I felt miserable after reading it. The Indian government should start taking a little pride in their country and start taking meaningful steps in preventing terrorist attacks. Leave the candle light vigils to social groups!!
    Home Ministry and solidarityBy: MV | 01-Dec-2009 Reply | Forward The idea of a solidarity rally sounds good but how effective is it? Is it going to scan our airports and railways and beaches for terrorists? The Home Ministry and the government should spend their time more effectively in having undercover operations to find terrorists and break up their operations. This is another way of wasting tax money to do nothing. How about training police officers, giving them good weapons? The New York Times wrote a scathing article that there was no real improvements made in fighting terrorism in Mumbai, a year after the Mumbai attack. I felt miserable after reading it. The Indian government should start taking a little pride in their country and start taking meaningful steps in preventing terrorist attacks. Leave the candle light vigils to social groups!!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.