Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Cocking a snuke

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • One is an ageing North Korean cargo tub with more than one previous owner and a record of weapons trafficking. The other, shadowing the Kang Nam 1 as it chugs slowly round China's coast on its way, it is believed, to a port in Myanmar via the Malacca Strait, is an American guided-missile destroyer, bristling with up-to-date radars and weaponry. But it is to be hoped that the captain of the USS McCampbell, reportedly taking over the tracking from a sister ship, the USS John McCain, has at least one old-fashioned bit of naval kit on board: a bullhorn.

    The American ships are doing UN-approved duty. Resolution 1874, passed unanimously by the Security Council on June 12th permits the searching of North Korean cargoes on vessels on the high seas suspected of carrying illegal arms shipments. But, in what seems a nose-thumbers' charter, it requires the flag-owner's consent, which in this case is highly unlikely to be forthcoming. If the Americans cannot direct the Kang Nam 1 with stern words to a nearby port for a search, they will have to hope a shortage of fuel forces it to dock.

    Ads by Google

    The new restrictions on North Korea limit its weapons imports to small arms, and ban all arms exports, conventional or otherwise. They followed a provocative long-range missile test and last month a defiant claim of the country's second nuclear test. Puzzlingly, sensors failed to detect telltale gases that usually leak out within days of such a test, but that could be because North Korea is, troublingly, better at testing small nuclear warheads deep underground than observers had guessed.

    The regime's ailing boss, Kim Jong Il, is preparing more fireworks: perhaps another nuclear test; almost certainly short- and medium-range missile firings. A new launch-pad being prepared in the west of the country would allow testing of intercontinental-range rockets to the south, instead of as now across the Pacific towards America, which has threatened to shoot down any that appear threatening.

    Where will all this lead? China and Russia, angered at Mr Kim's nuclear antics, agreed to support sanctions on his illicit weapons trade, but want six-party negotiations that also include America, South Korea and Japan, as well as North Korea, to resume. North Korea says it will come to the table as a "proud nuclear power" with no intention of giving up its bombs. "Delusional" is how one senior American official describes Mr Kim's demand to be accepted as a nuclear power; South Korea and Japan concur.

    Meanwhile the fear is that Mr Kim will resume (if he ever stopped) helping others with their nuclear work. Financial records show that Mr Kim co-operated with a network run by a disgraced former Pakistani scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan, to help supply Libya with nuclear material for uranium-enrichment work before the country abandoned its weapons effort. A nuclear reactor Mr Kim was secretly building for Syria, one ideally sized for producing plutonium for bombs, was destroyed by Israel in 2007 just before its completion.

    Some reports say the Kang Nam 1 is carrying missile parts; others that it is shipping mostly small arms to the junta in Myanmar. Mr Kim has sometimes used Myanmar to trans-ship missile parts, and who knows what else, to Iran. But Myanmar itself is a headache now, too. Russia has agreed to build it a small nuclear-research reactor. The worry is this nuclear toing and froing could disguise another joint venture, with North Korea: the secret building of a reactor like both Syria's and the one Mr Kim has used to produce plutonium for his own weapons tests.

    © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2009

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.