Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Common Minimum Pranab

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Pranab
    'Just as one does not collect unripe fruits, (the king) shall avoid taking wealth that is not due because that will make the people angry and spoil the very sources of revenue.'
    Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee’s bold gamble of letting the fiscal deficit slip out of his hands may still have paid off had he articulated a vision for economic reforms in the debut Budget of the United Progressive Alliance II (UPA II) government. A further fiscal stimulus of Rs 40,000 crore, through additional Plan expenditure for rural infrastructure, has pushed the gross fiscal deficit of the Centre (6.8 per cent of GDP) and states (4 per cent of GDP) to double digit levels for 2009-10, a throwback to the early 1990s.

    Deep deficit, shallow response make hope, market sink

    The unambiguous mandate that the Congress-led UPA received in the general elections had re-ignited expectations of systematic reforms over the next five years. Mukherjee did not manage expectations well and missed an opportunity to showcase UPA II’s commitment to bold actions on several fronts — be it disinvestment, labour flexibility, targeted subsidies or structural tax reforms.

    Ads by Google

    On cue, the Bombay Stock Exchange Sensitive Index (Sensex) tanked 870 points or 5.83 per cent, the sharpest fall ever on a Budget day.

    Mukherjee’s speech had all the accompaniments of a Budget that he would have presented 25 years ago. Old-fashioned but shrewd, the Finance Minister showered benefits on all stakeholders: marginal tax sops for the salaried, excise duty cuts on a host of items — from LCD panels to gems and jewellery — retaining excise, customs and service tax rates at existing low levels and, surprisingly, giving a bonanza to the upper middle class by doing away with the distortionary 10 per cent surcharge and doubling the threshold on wealth tax of 1 per cent to Rs 30 lakh.

    He kept the central excise rate, customs duty and service tax rates intact. He hiked the minimum alternate tax for zero-tax companies to 15 per cent — not seen lightly by India Inc. Even as he did away with the commodities transaction tax, he retained the securities transaction tax creating arbitrage opportunities between two segments of financial markets. Mukherjee’s direct tax measures were revenue neutral, but in indirect taxes, the additional resource mobilization was a meagre Rs 2,000 crore.

    After all, it was an expenditure budget.

    He used all available resources for enhancing allocations of existing flagship programmes such as the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act.

    He also set aside modest sums for new social sector schemes such as Rajiv Awas Yojana and Pradhan Mantri Adarsh Gram Yojana for villages which have a Scheduled Caste majority.

    His large expenditure plan — the total spend tops Rs 10 lakh crore for the current fiscal — has given him the confidence to assume a growth rate of 7 per cent in the current fiscal with inflation stabilizing between 2 per cent and 4 per cent by March 2010.

    Playing along the fiscal stimulus plan and recognising that infrastructure was one area neglected in the last few years, Mukherjee facilitated Rs 1,00,000 crore worth investment in public private partnership projects through a refinance window made available by IIFCL.

    The veteran politician in Mukherjee ensured that his presentation was not chaotic — just two interruptions by Lalu Prasad Yadav and Mulayam Singh Yadav — and devoid of announcements that would evoke strong sentiments. “He did not have to make big announcements just for the market,” said Vijayan Krishnamurthy, Executive Chairman, JP Morgan AMC, adding these can be undertaken outside the Budget.

    The speech, as expected after the poll outcome and the President’s speech, focused on inclusive growth and bridging the rural-urban divide by promising banking presence in all unbanked blocks, housing for urban poor, 1 per cent interest relief for farmers who paid short-term crop loans on time, 45 per cent hike in allocation for Bharat Nirman and a new scheme for 1,000 villages with Scheduled Caste majority.

    Perhaps, Mukherjee believed that big-ticket reform measures need not be announced in the Budget. Yes, he did not steal the thunder of his Cabinet colleagues but did not read the pulse of the market either.

    Insipid BudgetBy: denis khan | 07-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Budget sops are negated due to the black holed economy at the macro and micro level. This is evident from the crores of rupees disappearing at the macro level, and small change vanishing at the micro level.At the macro level, according to a reported estimate of more than $7 Trillions, deposited in Swiss Banking System, about $2 Trillion deposits might be from India.The BJP promised to bring back $ 2 trillion deposits allegedly stashed abroad. At the micro level, the disappearing small change is the Achilles’ heel of the Indian economy.In India today, the common man is required to pay in small change for every imaginable expenditure. However, it is difficult to receive small change in return. There is no value for the small coins. The largest denomination coin is the bottom of acceptable currency.Super malls print bills 'rounding off' the small coins. We should try to block these arteries that can supply illegal money to terrorists and antisocial elements
    GOOD BUDJET -FOR ESMBy: GVNS RAO | 07-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Good Budjet. The dream of all ex servicemen has com true. this will keep the morale of the defence forces up.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.