Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Compound Interest on Debt

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Atwood

    It better not be. And, of course, it isn’t. Well, not entirely, in Atwood’s telling. She is a Canadian novelist fabled to be a manic collector of facts, an obsessive who throws all interesting bits of news and theory into a big brown box, a grand old woman of letters who writes on ancient myth and contemporary work. In this slim book, she draws on all that to inquire into the biological and philosophical tentacles of debt. But, for those unfamiliar with her fiction, it must be immediately clarified that Atwood is also a novelist of dystopia. So, come to this book expecting at some point dark and extreme predictions of what awaits us.

    She argues that for a mental construct like debt to be viable, certain preconditions are necessary, like notions of fairness and equivalent values. But could these notions be biologically wired into us? Research indicates that chimpanzees have a sense of “debts of honour” or “reciprocal altruism”: “Chimp A helps Chimp B to gang up on Chimp C and expects to be helped in turn. If Chimp B then doesn’t come through at the time of Chimp A’s need, Chimp A is enraged and throws a screaming temper tantrum.” Atwood cites other work substantiating the existence of a “cheater-detection module” among the mental organs governing reciprocal altruism. Therefore, there is a mutually dependent relationship between debtor and creditor.

    Ads by Google

    Atwood harks back to myth and literature to ask who is “morally worse” — debtor or creditor? But the feistiest, the most Atwoodian and, therefore, provocative part of the inquiry relates to her view of the future. In her novels, Atwood is a great practitioner of dystopian exaggeration to make the point that truly horrid futures await us if humanity does not mend its ways. In her most defining novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, she warned of what may happen if fundamentalisms that deny women equal status win out. In the more recent Oryx and Crake, she posted a caution on blind application of biotechnology solutions. Perhaps because Payback is not a work of fiction, she is more restrained in prediction-making, but only just.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.