Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

‘Controversies and ridicule are part of public service. But the message going out is that Ramadoss is against tobacco’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • IdeaExchange
    Dr Anbumani Ramadoss at the EXPRESS

    Coomi Kapoor: Dr Ramadoss, would you agree that you are the most controversial Health Minister we’ve had—the AIIMS tussle, your attempts to ban smoking, your criticism of actors for smoking in public and your desire to legalise homosexuality?

    Ramadoss: I am not a controversial person but I am not afraid of controversies. Between 1998 and 2004, there were six health ministers in six years. Health was not given much prominence in the last few decades—it was a quiet ministry. As a doctor and someone who has travelled a lot, I want to replicate the changes I see around the world in India. We all know how difficult it is to bring about any change in Indian society because we have a mindset that is impossible to change. It takes a lot of perseverance and sometimes it results in controversies. My initial months as Health Minister were very stressful. I am a very quiet, shy guy. So I shunned criticism and did my job.

    Ads by Google

    Before I took over, the health ministry was in poor shape. But now it has changed for the better. For instance, the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM)—if I ever want to be remembered for my work it will be NRHM and not the anti-tobacco activity. NRHM is the fastest expanding public health programme in the world. I eat, sleep and dream this programme. It is like a silent revolution. Bihar, for example, had an average patient attendance of 40 two years ago. After NRHM, it is 4,000. From 40 to 4,000 in two years is no joke.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Health ProgrammesBy: Dr.Dinesh Jagiasi | 15-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Hello Sir,Unlike others I dont have any complains (however let me introduce myself first Iam a student of Health administration)would like to get one thing clarified that when we talking of public health then why dont we come out of this "programme mode"....I agree that NRHM is a success but why do we need a speciallized programme for our normal requirements..rather why not strengthen PHCs.
    interview with health ministerBy: Sherry | 15-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Public health institutions are in a mess and getting worse by the day, putting a huge burden on the poor, and I doubt NRHM will have the desired impact. So, overall, I would say he has failed in the most important function of a health minister. But it is true that he has upgraded the profile of the health ministry and has implemented the ban on smoking in public places - a long overdue step - and is trying to decriminalise homosexuality. I doubt he will succeed in banning alcohol consumption, but good luck to him if he does.
    Kudos to health ministerBy: G Sundar | 13-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward I don't really understand what transpired between the health minister and Dr. Venugopal or who is at fault. But I agree with the other actions of the minister Anbumani like anti smoking, decriminalizing gays etc. I applaud the minister for the NRHM achievements. I always believe new young minds are required instead of clinging to 80 plus politicians.
    CONTROVERSIES ARE PART By: B.L.GOEL | 12-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward controverseries are a part
    Good luckBy: monica | 12-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward At least someone is willing to take a stand on issues and not taking the passive convenient approach. The chata hai tendency of most Indians needs very strong action to wake people up. Good luck Ramadoss!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.