Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

‘Controversies and ridicule are part of public service. But the message going out is that Ramadoss is against tobacco’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • IdeaExchange
    Dr Anbumani Ramadoss at the EXPRESS

    Before NRHM, we had only 3,500 specialist doctors for gynaecology, nephrology, etc., in the public health sector. That figure has now doubled to 7,000. Before NRHM, there were only 20,000 doctors, now there are 30,000 doctors in primary health centres (PHCs). From 22,000 nurses, we have gone up to 35,000 nurses. And we have a whole new cadre of six lakh ASHAs  (Accredited Social Health Activists).

    When I took over as health minister, the ministry’s total allocation was Rs 6,000 crore; today I get Rs 16,500 crore. This is what we have achieved in four years.

    In NRHM we had to set up everything from scratch. Our money goes directly to the district from the Centre. Earlier, plans and allocations made in Delhi were forced down the throats of the people. Now the people in the districts tell us what they want and we give them the money to do it.

    Ads by Google

    We have promoted institutional deliveries under the Janani Suraksha Yojana to bring down maternal mortality. We pay Rs 1,400 to the mother for going to a hospital—public or private. In 2005, the total number of mothers benefiting from this scheme was six lakh. In 2006, it was 31 lakh and today it is 65 lakh.  Tamil Nadu is the first state where Caesarean operations are performed in PHCs. The World Health Organisation (WHO) is thinking of replicating the model in other countries. Another huge success is that for the first time in three years, HIV-AIDS is coming down.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Health ProgrammesBy: Dr.Dinesh Jagiasi | 15-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Hello Sir,Unlike others I dont have any complains (however let me introduce myself first Iam a student of Health administration)would like to get one thing clarified that when we talking of public health then why dont we come out of this "programme mode"....I agree that NRHM is a success but why do we need a speciallized programme for our normal requirements..rather why not strengthen PHCs.
    interview with health ministerBy: Sherry | 15-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Public health institutions are in a mess and getting worse by the day, putting a huge burden on the poor, and I doubt NRHM will have the desired impact. So, overall, I would say he has failed in the most important function of a health minister. But it is true that he has upgraded the profile of the health ministry and has implemented the ban on smoking in public places - a long overdue step - and is trying to decriminalise homosexuality. I doubt he will succeed in banning alcohol consumption, but good luck to him if he does.
    Kudos to health ministerBy: G Sundar | 13-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward I don't really understand what transpired between the health minister and Dr. Venugopal or who is at fault. But I agree with the other actions of the minister Anbumani like anti smoking, decriminalizing gays etc. I applaud the minister for the NRHM achievements. I always believe new young minds are required instead of clinging to 80 plus politicians.
    CONTROVERSIES ARE PART By: B.L.GOEL | 12-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward controverseries are a part
    Good luckBy: monica | 12-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward At least someone is willing to take a stand on issues and not taking the passive convenient approach. The chata hai tendency of most Indians needs very strong action to wake people up. Good luck Ramadoss!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.