Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Court firm: have to examine commandos, get them here

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Kasab
    Powder in my food: Kasab

    Turning down the prosecution’s plea that it would rather not examine the National Security Guard (NSG) commandos who carried out counter-terrorist operations at Hotel Taj Mahal Palace and Nariman House during the 26/11 terror attack, the special sessions court on Friday directed the Mumbai Police Crime Branch to get correct details of two NSG commandos involved in the operations.

    The police have been given till October 26 to furnish the details, following which summonses will be issued to the two commandos.

    The prosecution had said examining the commandos would be dangerous for society at large as it would expose the NSG’s counter-terrorist techniques.

    This would help terrorists in future attacks to combat the NSG, the prosecution had contended.

    Special sessions judge M L Tahaliyani observed, “It (the court) cannot be a silent spectator while the prosecution adduces the evidence, and it has to cover all sides. So far the evidence¿ of witnesses from Taj Hotel, Nariman House and Trident-Oberoi Hotels is not sufficient to prove the charge of Section 121 (waging war against the nation) of the Indian Penal Code.”

    Ads by Google

    Rejecting the apprehensions raised by the prosecution in an eight-page reply, the court observed, “The techniques used by the armed forces are shared universally among each other, and they are easily available on the Internet. Moreover, the techniques are not predefined but are adopted as per the topography of the targets and resistance by the attackers.”

    Citing the Supreme Court judgment in the 2001 Parliament attack case, the court ruled, “Serious charges of waging war against the Government of India had been framed against all three accused in the case. It is important to get evidence from the NSG as to how they combated the alleged terrorists to prove the resistance they posed.”

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Another Burning Example of Inefficiency of JudgesBy: D K Singh | 19-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Wonder ! Next time another judge will call anoyher soldier to appear in court to explain how he fought on frontier in which he solely made enemy to lick the dust and victory for the nation ensured .Please do not open the page of the book which language you do not understand .
    ANOTHER BLUNDERBy: prem seth | 19-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward IT WOULD BE THE GREATEST BLUNDER ON THE PART OF COURTS TO SUMMON THE TWO COMMANDOS. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER IF TAHILANI WAS CAUGHT BETWEEN THE CROSSFIRE ON 26/11, MAYBE THEN HE WOULD HAVE REALISED THAT THE TERRORIST WERE WAGING A WAR AGAINST THE NATION. OR MAYBE MR. TAHILANI WAS WATCHING MOVIE ON 26/11 N DIDNT SEE THE MAYHEM AT TAJ N OTHER PLACES ON T.V. WHAT A SHAME, TAHILANI SEEM TO BE SPEAKING THE SAME LANGUAGE AS PAK. LEADERS.
    EVIDENCE OF COMMANDOSBy: avinash | 17-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Sir, As the Commanding Officer of the First Anti Terrorist Force for India, I raised, commnded and took in to various operations submit and urge the honourable court not to expose faces of the NSG officders in question. Instead they may be examined strictly in camera with no one else present in the court. The reason for this is different then the one given by the prosecution. All through out the world, anti terrorist forces cover their faces during operations and are not required to depose for the simple reason that if their faces are exposed by the media or by any other means then the terrorists are likely to track down their families and exterminate them to put fear in the minds of the forces and thus deter them to fight against them in future.Ask SAS UK, GSG9 Germany, GIGN France, MOSAD Isreal, Seals/Force Delta of US; all these have the same reason as given by me. I urge the honourable court to take cognigence of this fact.
    We can't expect a honest decision from a judiciary where 74% of it's work force is corrupt. By: Sanjeev | 17-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Judge has gone mad. Why he wanted to expose the NSG commandos those carried out the operations at Taj or Nariman point? Rather I would say it will be better if police stages a fake encounter to kill Keshab claiming that he tried to escape or something..You can't expect the court to sentence him. Don't we remember that same court took 14 years to come up with the sentence for accused in Mumbai bomb blasts. Still some people involved are out and are free to move ..Sanjay Dutt is live example.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.