Court orders in camera proceedings

Scores of lawyers and mediapersons packed the courtroom, leading to chaos in the proceedings. Noting that there was "virtually a crowd occupying every inch of space in the courtroom, even to the extent of standing next to the sitting space allotted to the reader and stenographer," the court held that "it has become completely impossible for the court proceedings."

Several lawyers present in the courtroom wore red ribbons on their arms to register solidarity with the rape victim and protest over crimes against women. Arguments broke out among groups of lawyers on the question of representing the accused.

One advocate from the Supreme Court, who appeared in the court and claimed that he had been engaged by "a relative of the accused" to represent them in court, was the target of several people, including lawyers. He was shouted at, even threatened by those gathered there who demanded that the accused be handed to the public and hanged without a "useless protracted trial."

Another advocate who claimed to have "volunteered to become amicus curiae in the case" to "assist the court in ensuring a fair trial by representing the accused" was also targeted by the crowd.

People were asked by the court staff to move out but they did not listen. While ordering in camera proceedings, the magistrate observed that "the lock-up in-charge states that he is unable to bring the accused persons in the court for want of safe passage or room in the court".

The prosecution had also moved an application in court for proceedings to be held in camera after appeals by police personnel to vacate space in the courtroom for the accused had no effect.

ALSO READ

Problem is hypersensitive India and political lobbies, not Censor Board, says Anurag Kashyap

Railways returns to Joshi, Sibal gets crucial law ministry

They hold a mirror to our times, Anurag and Dibakar are guests at Adda on Friday night

Siddaramaiah seen ahead in Karnataka CM race