Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Court proceedings not under RTI Act: CIC

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • In a landmark decision, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that judicial proceedings of all courts and tribunals are beyond the purview of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

    “...a judicial authority must function with total independence and freedom. Should it be found that an action initiated under the RTI Act impignes upon the authority of that judicial body, the Commission will not authorise the use of the RTI Act for any such disclosure requirement,” a full bench headed by Chief Information Commissioner Wajahat Habibullah said in its 22-page order.

    Terming any intrusion in regard to judicial work as “unnecessary”, the bench noted that “judiciary is independent and all judicial authorities including all courts and tribunals must work independently and without any interference in so far as their judicial work is concerned.”

    Ads by Google

    The order came on an application of Delhi-based Chartered Accountant Rakesh Kumar Gupta, who had sought from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) copies of minutes as maintained by members of its bench in an Income Tax assessment case of Escorts Limited and had also asked for inspection of the case records.

    The matter, which was taken up with the CIC following ITAT’s denial of the information, was contested by the tribunal on the ground that as per relevant rules of Income Tax Act, such copies of its orders could only be provided to the concerned assesses. The tribunal further contended that Escorts Limited had “strongly objected” to such inspection of the records.

    “...It would not be appropriate for the Commission or any entity functioning as part of the RTI regime, to pronounce on the disclosure of a given set of information, if it is found that under another law (such as Income Tax Act), this disclosure function is exercisable as part of the judicial function by a judicial authority, such as the ITAT,” the bench noted.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.