Court summons Ruia and Mittal in 2G case
Related
Top Stories
- Spot-fixing: Petition in SC seeks stay on IPL matches, demands SIT probe
- India, China call for end to incursion issue, sign 8 deals to boost ties
- Sanjay Dutt spends restless nights as officials yet to decide on his jail
- Aarushi murder case: Rajesh Talwar claims he was asleep when killings took place
- Yahoo! says will acquire Tumblr for $1.1 bn, eyes billion visitors mark

Naming them as accused in the alleged irregularities in the allotment of telecom spectrum in 2001-02, a special CBI court Tuesday issued summons to Bharti Airtel chairman Sunil Bharti Mittal, Essar Group promoter Ravi Ruia and former Hutchison Max telecom MD Asim Ghosh.
The court's move came a week after CBI informed the court that it had been "unable to identify" company officials responsible for the alleged conspiracy in the allotment of additional spectrum to the three firms over a decade ago.
Special CBI judge O P Saini said that since these officials "were/are prima facie in control of affairs of the respective companies" and therefore "represented the directing mind and will of each company", they could be held accountable for the actions of their companies.
The court also took cognisance of the chargesheet filed by CBI on December 21. The chargesheet names former telecom secretary Shyamal Ghosh, Bharti Airtel, Hutchison Max (now Vodafone India Ltd) and Sterling Cellular (now Vodafone Mobile Services) as accused in the conspiracy to allot additional spectrum to the companies at lower rates, causing a loss of over Rs 846 crore to the government.
The 57-page chargesheet had, however, failed to name any officials of the three companies even though it had alleged that "investigations had revealed that various directors, promoters and representatives of the telecom companies had been meeting the accused public servants in connection with getting allocation of the additional spectrum".
The court had on two occasions asked the agency to identify company officials responsible, but the CBI had said it had not been able to identify any officials despite its best efforts. An NGO, Telecom Watchdog, had also filed an application demanding a probe into the conduct of the CBI, alleging that the investigation agency was deliberately "shielding" Mittal and had therefore "dropped his name" from the chargesheet despite evidence against him.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- If found guilty, BCCI to ask ICC to erase Sreesanth records
- Top cops among 42 named in death of blast accused
- Manmohan-Li talks: PM takes tough line on incursion issue
- Security forces blame Maoists, villagers say CoBRA man was killed in 'friendly fire'
- Travellers’ nightmare: Yellow fever vaccine stocks run out, production unit awaits repair


Janampatri to genomepatri, the leap forward in predicting future
Despite fast-track courts, rape conviction rate still low
Lanka strikes back, wants to partner IOC in oil tanks pact
Party support on track, Bansal, Ashwani to stay




















