“We are being isolated”, top Maoist leaders yelled, and announced the formation of their own government. They also began a boycott-cum-obstruction campaign of the president and prime minister socially and politically, accusing them of not honouring the principle of civilian supremacy. And from their previous position that ‘we are committed’ to the peace and the constitution-making process’, the former rebels are now warning that they should not be held responsible if the constitution cannot be written within the stipulated 2010 May time frame. Maoists also announced the formation of what looks like a parallel government, not a shadow cabinet , ‘in exercise of government power’ — which does not belong to them as the party is in the opposition now. All this was done after the party’s candidate Narayan Kaji Shrestha ‘Prakash’ lost the race for the chief of the constitution committee to Nilambar Acharya, a liberal democrat.

Last week, the constituent assembly committee on the judiciary, headed by a Maoist leader and with most members from the party, recommended that a future Nepali judiciary should not be an independent entity. Rather, it should be controlled and influenced by the legislature. This is not something that was unanticipated. Top Maoist leaders, despite signing the 12-point agreement committing themselves to peace and democracy, have made it clear all along that their joining the peace and democratic process ‘for now’ was merely tactical in nature. Creating a political and constitutional vacuum has been the method that Maoists have been pursuing in the past three years. The parties that probably could not see through the game were the Nepali Congress and the Communist Party of Nepal-Unified Marxist Leninist (CPN-UML). The two major pro-democracy parties have now begun accusing the Maoists of trying to derail peace and democracy.

... contd.