Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Cow milk for infants: A tradition best forgotten

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • When it comes to nutritional practices and beliefs, many women seem to place great faith in our tradition. Though there is much that is important and useful in our folklore, in matters of health it is always safe to err on the side of caution. This maxim is particularly relevant in the context of the use of animal milk for infants.

    In our land, when an infant is weaned from mother’s milk, it has traditionally been the practice to replace the mother’s milk with cow’s milk. This can have unpleasant consequences. One of the most common food allergies happens to be the allergy to milk (both cow’s and buffalo’s milk). Data suggests that cow milk allergy affects more than 2 per cent of the infant population all over the world.

    The reason for developing this allergy seems to be quite straightforward.

    Animal milk is usually the first foreign protein that is encountered by an infant. In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics advises against consumption of cow’s milk (or buffalo’s milk) in the first year of an infant’s life. Such animal milk is erroneously considered an appropriate replacement for breast milk or infant formula milk.

    Ads by Google

    There are many reasons as to why such milk is not the best choice.

    It does not provide adequate Vitamin C or iron and on the other hand has excessive sodium and protein.

    Feeding an infant who is less than one year old with cow’s milk increases the risk of anaemia and cow milk allergy.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Cow's milk is bad?By: saras | 19-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward If u have grown up in 70s and even 80s u will remeber similar bias against breast feeding and blatant promotion of 'formula' milk powders etc, which were touted as being good as they are more 'balanced' than nature's best gift to a child, to such an extent that even ht epoor who could hardly afford it would go out of the way to feed their infants these expensive(and ultimately proven to be much worse than human breast milk) formula diets. Now that u cannot win over mother's milk, easiest to target is cow's milk, which is abundantly available, universally used in India since time immeorial and was the natural alternative/supplement to mother's milk if it was inadequate/needed supplementation.Unfortunately our english speaking 'elite' readers would gloss over the headlines and blindly follow these without seeing both sides of the coin.The reach and clout of the profit driven american pharma and food industry is unbeleivable and can manufacture/highlight studies which favor them.
    Remember the theory of Aryan invasionBy: Amit | 19-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Similar to what we have seen before where western beliefs have been forced down upon us. This is not an anti-western rant. But, I would like to see the % of people developing allergies because of chemical formulae injected in infants' bodies. Where is the data on that? You can't just show 1 data set and draw conclusion? In fact some of the Indian traditions are best suited for living. Farmers in Punjab are giving up the genetically modified high yield wheat.. why? Because they realized organic farming is better! Who brought the chemical farming? West! So when u highlight high yield also show chemicals going in the soil and our bodies through water as water tables are getting contaminated! Do a complete comparison!
    Propangada style american medical findings.By: Bharata | 16-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward This article is a good example of aping american medicine. Has the author bothered to collect data on how Bharatiya peadiatricians have been successfully handling milk nutrition post weaning from breast fed milk since decades? Ask honest peadiatricians without the american bias. They will tell you that cow's milk (handled well) will rarely bring allergies or anaemia. Like one reader pointed, 2% of unfavourable incidence is wrong to judge cow's milk. Will the author bother to verify such american biased research before writing? Remember track record of american medical research papers. Examples, cholesterol, harmone replacement therapy, glucosamine for arthritis etc. These were all pharma led research which american medicine is fond of promoting. Do we need to fall prey to such propaganda medicine? Isn't honest, fact led medical research with strong empirical clinical findings gathered from the local population better? --Vande Mataram
    Half truth is more dangerous than blatant liesBy: Shiv | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward It is true that some infants can develop cow milk allergy but look at the figures quoted by article itself- 2%! For an unfavourable incidence of 2%, if you are going to discard food products then you may have to discard eating altogether!In fact, being too peculiar and hygienic about infant feeding has led to increase in allergies in the west. Indian practices are overall quite good for overall well rounded development; however, mothers should be educated about hygiene, balanced nutrition and not relying on cow's milk alone.What is worrisome is irresponsible Indian media which publishes one sided unbalanced articles on every issue.
    Good ArticleBy: Selva | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward The facts mentioned are very true for kids having eczema. Thanks for having this article published.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.