Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Cracks in the jigsaw

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Recent experience of coalition politics began with attempts to keep both the Congress and the BJP away (1989-1998). The second phase saw two coalitions led by those same two parties (1999-2004). Are we now going back to post-election alliances rather than pre-poll coalitions?

    Just when coalitions were appearing to stabilise, they have started cracking. First, it was the UPA-LF coalition that split on the rock of the nuclear deal. But the NDA was not to be left behind: it steadily kept losing partners — the National Conference, Trinmool, and finally the BJD. One would have thought that the Congress would seize the initiative and create a larger alliance before the elections; but the party, even while forging an alliance with Mamata Banerjee, chose to literally throw away partners in a too-clever-by-half move, announcing instead that it would not have any national level alliance. Come election season and everyone is finding new allies and finding excuses to dump older allies.

    Ads by Google

    This takes away the artificial bipolarity that politics had assumed for some time and alerts us to the essentially fractured character of the political space. In Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, this would produce at least four-cornered contests; Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh would see triangular contests; and so on. In January, the UPA was all set to make a comeback; suddenly, the picture has become more crowded and contingent.

    A quick look at the history of coalition politics in the recent past shows that except the Left Front — and perhaps the early alliance of the Shiv Sena and BJP in Maharashtra — very few alliances were either ideological or with any common political programme. Anti-Congressism was the driving force behind much of it. Thus, the BJP carefully cultivated a friendship with anti-Congress forces like the BJD in Orissa, splinters of the Janata Dal like the Samata and the Lok Janashakti, etc. That gave the BJP the critical mass required for forming the NDA. As the ability of the BJP to function as a nucleus of anti-Congressism gets eroded, these parties have no use for the BJP.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Coalition governmentBy: Dr B Sundara | 20-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward So we dont have well-defined and cohesive coalitions and thus we are not clear about whom to vote because we are not sure of the composition of the government that would govern us for the next five years. We cannot vote for any clear ideology or manifesto. Then it would be better to go with the regional players since they can exert sufficient power and play with the government and try to garner as much power and resources to the region from which they come from. This infact may benefit the people of the region concerned.
    change SELECTION of P.M by few to ELECTION of P.M by ELECTED M.Ps to PROGRESS Democracy in IndiaBy: H E LANCELOT FERNANDES | 20-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward RESTRUCTURING ELECTION OF PRIME MINISTER FOR STABLE GOVERANCEAll the ENECTED M.Ps have the right to stand for the post of P.M as long as they are proposed by not less than 10% strength.The P.M to be ELECTED on the floor of the house within 5days on announcing the result of ELECTION of M.Ps. Thi is to avoid HORSE TRADING.The ELECTION process to be in 2rounds on teh floor of the Parliament.First in teh morning. Those 3 getting highest to move into 2nd round which will take place in the noon. The one who gets highest vots will be the P.M for WHOLE term avoiding the MOCKERY of few M.Ps pulling down the functioning Government for any reasons.Withe the above system India will have workable peoples ELECTED Democracy while now it is SELECTED by the Party or few peoples.With the above CHANGE we can PROGRESS the FUNCTIONING Democracy in India which we have FAILED to achive in teh past 60years.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.