Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Cracks in the jigsaw

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • What has made this possible? Three things have contributed. First, the calculated risk the LF took in deserting the UPA altered the last four years’ political equations. Without any ambition about national-level power for itself, and no possibility of winning a national mandate, the Left has always nurtured the ambition of reigning from behind the scenes and positioning itself as the nucleus of non-Congress, non-BJP forces — the classic “third force” (or is it the second force?). So long as it supported the UPA, the LF only hurt the NDA. The moment it cut itself loose from the UPA, it went back to that role it has sought for itself throughout the last decade of the twentieth century.

    Second, the dramatic rise of Mayawati in UP must have sent warning signals to all those parties and leaders nursing ambitions of gaining by coalition politics. Should Mayawati wrest the initiative in this election, the opportunities for many a prime ministerial candidate will shrink. Her victory in UP also indicated that not joining any pre-existing alliance could create its own dividends.

    Ads by Google

    Third, and perhaps most significant, the latest developments have yet again brought into sharp focus the lack of clear vision in the Congress. It is not just a question of smart electoral strategy. That is part of it, but more than that, the Congress has refused to redefine itself — and hence been trapped by its own inflated self-image. In 2004, the Congress regained power almost providentially; the Vajpayee government was not unpopular, and yet many factors led to its undoing. At that moment the Congress had two options: it could have redefined itself like New Labour, as advised by some, or it could have fashioned an intelligent compromise learnt from the politics of the post-Mandal era. The party did neither. It simply trudged along expecting that its star will rise with the rising “son”. The collapse of the “party with a difference”, and the refusal of the Congress to redefine itself, thus open up the possibility of the third phase of coalition politics in a span of two decades.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Coalition governmentBy: Dr B Sundara | 20-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward So we dont have well-defined and cohesive coalitions and thus we are not clear about whom to vote because we are not sure of the composition of the government that would govern us for the next five years. We cannot vote for any clear ideology or manifesto. Then it would be better to go with the regional players since they can exert sufficient power and play with the government and try to garner as much power and resources to the region from which they come from. This infact may benefit the people of the region concerned.
    change SELECTION of P.M by few to ELECTION of P.M by ELECTED M.Ps to PROGRESS Democracy in IndiaBy: H E LANCELOT FERNANDES | 20-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward RESTRUCTURING ELECTION OF PRIME MINISTER FOR STABLE GOVERANCEAll the ENECTED M.Ps have the right to stand for the post of P.M as long as they are proposed by not less than 10% strength.The P.M to be ELECTED on the floor of the house within 5days on announcing the result of ELECTION of M.Ps. Thi is to avoid HORSE TRADING.The ELECTION process to be in 2rounds on teh floor of the Parliament.First in teh morning. Those 3 getting highest to move into 2nd round which will take place in the noon. The one who gets highest vots will be the P.M for WHOLE term avoiding the MOCKERY of few M.Ps pulling down the functioning Government for any reasons.Withe the above system India will have workable peoples ELECTED Democracy while now it is SELECTED by the Party or few peoples.With the above CHANGE we can PROGRESS the FUNCTIONING Democracy in India which we have FAILED to achive in teh past 60years.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.