Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Deadly confusion

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    This reflects a genuine confusion, strategic and tactical. Tactically, there was no single command structure for the operations being conducted since Wednesday night; this led to delays, crossed connections and redundancies, the cost of each of which could be measured in lives. The army, the navy and the police were running chains of command parallel to the NSG. Strategically, the security of the harbour, India’s territorial waters and the coastline is divided up between the Customs, woefully under-weaponed; the Coast Guard, always smarting under what it sees as stepmotherly treatment and with designs on being a brown-water force; and the navy. Through the gaps in this structure the terrorists may have sailed to Colaba, making landfall dangerously close to the navy’s sheathed sword, the submarines of Western Command. In 1993, there was an outcry when 800 kg of RDX landed on the Indian coast and destabilised Mumbai. What’s changed since then? And who’s accountable if it hasn’t?

    Previous12
    why biased against the security forces?By: Yash | 01-Dec-2008 Reply | Forward Dear Shekhar, when there was a need for speaking to the press, no one was willing because, they had no answers, and were scared of the pointed questions. this was the time when Army stepped in. Naval Marcos, had to do that press conference against their wishes, because of reasons u may not be able to fathom (anyone who has any exposure to special forces, will be able to make out). but it was nice of the indian express commandos to find fault with the only establishment which was functioning. NSG was not willing to speak to the press for obvious reasons, but when the bureaucrats realised the mileage being gained they immediately sent dutt (DG NSG) to show his face there. whatever these army officers spoke, was like a professional, and only what was possible to speak. it was also becoming a necessity because of the speculations being carried out by the channels. command? who was willing to take charge of the situation?
    taj attackBy: bhupinder | 29-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward We need a lots of innovation so that at least our forces can think like the terrorists.We have some moves planned with each kind of attack which is possible with current kind of tools(man,machine ,information).The thinking and then implementation in one step advance of terrorists can save the current insecurity
    This columnBy: Mr Kumar | 29-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward it is crap like this which destroys our country's confidence. you need to blame the politicians and the media for trying to be in the limelight all the time. for a change, i do want to hear the commandos views. perhaps, you would like to join a team before you can justify the bullshit your are talking about. these commandos are just as commendable as the foreign commandos you cite. get a life AH.
    Bias Against The Armed ForcesBy: An Indian Citizen | 29-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Mr Shekhar Gupta is well known in this Country, more as an Armed Forces Basher, remember his article "Its The Uniform" on 03 Sep 2008?
    Deadly delibrate confusionBy: Vinod | 29-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward It is because of the simple reason. Our politicians do not want to say any thing which seems to be pro non muslim or anti muslim. Since it was established that the attackers were muslims, the politicians shied away to say any thing about the success of the mission simply because they will have to mention that the terrorists were muslims, hence they shall loose muslim votes. As a passing remark, I may ask, why any prominent political leader did not attend the last rites of Sam Manikshaw? Simlply, because Sam crushed Pakistan and attending to his last rites could loose votes of muslims for any party who attends to his last journey. What a respect to the one time hero and what a pity of us.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.