As the communists conflate India’s nuclear imperatives with a moribund world view, the presence of Mohammad ElBaradei in the Capital this week should help calm down the acrimonious debate. India’s current political turbulence is unlikely to prevent ElBaradei from speaking the truth about the nuclear challenges confronting the international community, including the prospect for
India’s long overdue integration into the global nuclear order.
After all, this is not the first time that ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and winner of the Nobel Peace Prize in 2005, will be walking into a political minefield. On the eve of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq in March 2003, he demonstrated rare political courage to challenge the public rationale behind the Bush administration’s misadventure. In the critical testimonies before the United
Nations Security Council during 2002 and 2003, he argued that the available evidence was insufficient to prove that Saddam Hussein was reviving Iraq’s nuclear weapons programme. His assessments provided the basis for the majority of the UNSC to reject the causus belli offered by the United States against Saddam Hussein’s regime.
ElBaradei got into serious trouble for his integrity and professionalism, when the US tried to prevent him from getting a third term at the helm of the IAEA in 2005. Given the widespread support to his candidature for a rare third term as the head of an international agency, the Bush administration had to swallow its pride and allow his unanimous re-election.
More recently, ElBaradei found himself at odds with the US once again when he publicly counselled against imposing new sanctions on Iran and pointed to the prospect of greater cooperation between Tehran and the IAEA. The US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, responded angrily by saying that the IAEA should not meddle in the ‘business of diplomacy’ and limit itself to technical judgments.
... contd.
Epaper
Newsletter
Stocks
Weather
Horoscope
