You are here: IE »   Story

Death toll from China's ethnic riots hits 184

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • China communal riots
    Uighur woman with a child walks past paramilitary police on patrol near mosques in Urumqi, western China's Xinjiang province.
    Discount UK Shopping

    China raised the death toll from riots in its Xinjiang region to 184, state media said Saturday, giving an ethnic breakdown of the dead for the first time after communal violence broke out in this far western city.

    The official Xinhua News Agency said 137 of the victims belonged to the dominant Han ethnic group. The rest included 45 men and one woman who were Uighurs, and one man of the Hui Muslim ethnic group, the report said, citing the information office of the regional government.

    The previous death toll was 156. Xinhua gave no details on the newly reported deaths, including whether any were from Tuesday, when Han men seeking revenge for the original Uighur-led protest that turned violent marched through the streets with clubs and cleavers, trying to push past police guarding minority neighborhoods.

    Nearly a week after the rioting began, paramilitary police carrying automatic weapons and riot shields blocked some roads leading to the largely Muslim Uighur district of the city Saturday, and groups of 30 marched along the road chanting slogans encouraging ethnic unity.

    Ads by Google

    Some shops were still closed, and a police van blared public announcements in the Uighur language urging residents to oppose activist Rebiya Kadeer, a 62-year-old Uighur businesswoman who lives in exile in the U.S., whom China says instigated the riots. She has denied it.

    Protests continued Friday after a petite Muslim woman began complaining that the public washrooms were closed at a crowded mosque — the most important day of the week for Islamic worship. Muslims perform required ablutions, or washing, before prayer.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Death toll from China's ethnic riots hits 184By: Ratan Gupta | 13-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward When so many Hindus are being killed in Australia, it is called discrimination. When so many Christians are killed in our country, it is what? Now, when Chinese are intruding Muslim lands, all of a sudden it is fine. The western China was Muslim for over 1000 years. Where these Chinese has come from? Why did we then support Dalai Lama (CIA Agent) all these years. Let China have Tibet. What is the big deal then. The nation will never prosper if that nation do not take the stand on the principals.
    Death toll from China's ethnic riots hits 184By: Ratan Gupta | 13-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward So, we should be happy that China has killed thousands of Hindus and Buddhists in Tibet. So, we should be happy that China is claiming Himachal Pradesh to be its territory. So, some of us jumping upon the massacre of Muslims, should also jump when China extends billions to Pakistan for help. Why are we selectively appreciating China? Our hate of Muslims has destroyed our identities so much that we cannot even recognize ourselves today. Accept it. Muslims have ruled India for 1000 years with majesty and talent and skill. Muslims are ingredients of our nation. Sometimes we want to partner with west for fighting against Muslims, now all of a sudden, China has become our example. Do these stupids and idiots have ever realized how many Hindus resides in Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE the list will go on.... But these foxes and wolves have no meaning of life. They think that they are the true Bharatis....stupids.
    Consider the merits and demerits of each issue Mr. Raj, Do Not generalise issues based on preconceived prejudices even if you happen to be a communist. or a religious fanaticBy: aqmamin | 12-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The posting above by Mr Raj under the caption "Hope India learn(sic)is naive and shows absolute ignorance of Mr Raj on the history of nations and their minorities and the clauses, recommendations and the advice of the Human Right Charter of the UNO. Religious prejudice in India for some has become the mother of prejudices, unless and until all of us, regardless of our approach to God and culture, eradicates this disease; there is very little hope for co-existence and peace in a multi-cultural society. We should learn to consider the merits and demerits of each of the issues without generalising and with justice and righteousness.
    hope india learnBy: raj | 12-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward hope india ll learn from chinese government to fight agaisnt these type of terroist peoples
    The Uighur Region had a 90% native population until China deliberately changed the demography Mr Sam SmithBy: aqmamin | 12-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Part One: The Muslims fight for independence when they reach the 50% mark is an extremely unfair comment in the case of Uighur people. Their region was 90% populated only by the Uighurs until the communist revolution deliberately planned and carried our demographic change by forcing the majority Han ( the name of the majority race in China) to move to Uighur region and settle there, Historically, geographically, culturally, linguistically the people of Uighur do not belong to China. What the writer says is 100% true in the case of Israel. Even in 1947, when a nation called Israel was formed with the approval of the UNO, the percentage of Jews in Israel did not exceed 30% and by systematic persecution and discrimination to obliterate the religious and cultural identity of the non-Jewish original inhabitants (the Palestinians who belonged to different native races such as Moabites, Hittites, and Philistines and so on).
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.