Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Defence opposed, Home pushes AFSPA to PM’s table

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Keeping in mind Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s 2004 assurance in Manipur that provisions of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) would be reviewed, the Home Ministry has now taken the proposed amended Act to the Cabinet for a final political decision by the leadership though the Defence Ministry has totally opposed any changes.

    Tagged along with the proposed Act are the written objections of the Indian Armed Forces to any vital amendment to the AFSPA so that the Union Cabinet could take a considered view after examining the issue from the Home and Defence Ministry point of view. Simply put, with Defence Ministry refusing to play ball on the issue, the Home Ministry has left the decision to the Prime Minister.

    Junking the suggestions of the Justice Jeevan Reddy panel to repeal the Act, the Home Ministry had sought repealing key clause 4(a) that empowers an army officer or a person of equivalent rank to use force, including causing death, after being convinced that the individual is acting in contravention of law in a disturbed area. It had argued that provisions in the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) — namely sections 144, 100 and 46 — gave enough legitimacy to the Forces to prohibit assembly of more than five persons, shoot in self defense or kill a person resisting arrest, in that order.

    Ads by Google

    However, the Defence Ministry — speaking on behalf of the Armed Forces deployed in these ‘disturbed’ areas —these were extraordinary situations that had prompted the deployment of the Army or the Air Force. “Since these are not normal policing jobs, if called to do such duties, they must be empowered without getting dragged into court proceedings,” said a Defence Ministry official. It has argued that use of ordinary law like CrPC could result in a magisterial inquiry in the deaths with the onus on the officer to prove his innocence. “The Armed Forces don’t want to be dragged into courts. This would tie their hand and demoralise them,” he added.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.