Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Development does count but slums come first, says Chandivli MLA

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Slums
    Naseem Khan Prashant Nadkar

    Each time the development-versus-slums debate plays out in his constituency, three-time MLA and minister Naseem Khan has sided with the latter.

    Stretching from Kurla to Powai, the Chandivli constituency is caught in a whirlpool of projects such as the airport expansion and Mithi river revival, projects that require shanties to be cleared on a massive scale. Then there is also the Metro first corridor from Versova to Ghatkopar that had raked up protests from the commercial tenements in Khan’s constituency.

    Khan, who with a sweeping margin of 33,715 votes tops the victories in both Mumbai and Thane, states that as a people’s representative he will naturally raise his voice if slums are demolished without a proper rehabilitation plan. “A section of the media has always attacked me for my stand; one paper even went to the extent of calling me the godfather of slums. That doesn’t mean I am against development. I am with our government on their agenda of having a slum-free Mumbai,” said the former Minister of State for Home (Urban) whose 3.78 lakh-strong constituency comprises 65 per cent slums, with Muslims the predominant community.

    Ads by Google

    Stressing his pro-development stand, Khan talks about the pilot project of rehabilitating 2000 slum residents living on airport land at Rafiq Nagar, a project that was delayed by almost a decade. “The families were shifted to Dindoshi in Goregaon. If indeed I was supporting slums for votebank politics, then would I have agreed to have them rehabilitated outside my constituency?” he said.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    slum clearence By: richard dias | 03-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Why doesn't this MLA think of encourage rental housing policy instead of stopping development work. How can he demand that those living in shanties have no right to think of better life for themselves?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.