Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Did yesterday change anything?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Regional imbalances in Maharashtra have been discussed and debated endlessly in almost every kind of forum. The demand for Vidarbha as a separate state, which is an old one and the more recent demand for Mumbai as a separate state, are both reflections of the persistence of regional imbalances. Way back in 1984 the fact-finding committee under Dandekar gave us ‘backwardness’ indicators which sought to capture the regional discrepancies that prevailed in the state. The glaring skewness is only too apparent from the fact that in 2006-07, the share of Mumbai alone in the gross state domestic product (GSDP) was seen to been around 23 per cent; Mumbai, Nashik and Pune division together contributed almost 60 per cent to the GSDP while Amravati division’s contribution was a mere 6 per cent.

    The regional variation in the political clout wielded by the different regions is well known. Each of these administrative regions, apart from their distinct features, also have a predominant caste composition, which has an important bearing on electoral outcomes. With Assembly elections being closer home, these factors play a more significant role here than in the national elections. Consequently the recent delimitation — which has re-drawn political boundaries and created some turbulence in the traditional strongholds — is bound to have an important bearing on the forthcoming Assembly elections’ outcome. Post delimitation, the seats available to Vidarbha and Western Maharashtra (Congress-NCP strongholds) have reduced — both Vidarbha and Western Maharashtra have 4 seats less each (Vidarbha now has 62 and Western Maharashtra now has 58) while that of Konkan (BJP-SS strongholds) has risen from 65 to 75 as have the seats for Mumbai Suburban (an increase of 9 seats to 26), a stronghold of the Sena-BJP. This scenario seems to suggest that on paper, the Sena-BJP may have an edge over the Congress-NCP combine. However, if the Lok Sabha election results are to serve as a pointer, then the silver lining for the Congress is the MNS factor! A natural question which then arises is: should the balance of power tilt once again in favour of the Sena-BJP coalition in the forthcoming Assembly elections, how would this affect economic policies and investments in the state? One can venture to answer this question by computing annual growth rates of GSDP for the years of the Sena-BJP and the INC-NCP coalitions (see table).

    ... contd.

    Next12
    growth and politicsBy: nitin mathur | 14-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward This is a wonderfully analysed, straight from the heart article. Some interesting initiatives which should have a bearing by 2012 across Maharashtra.To cut down on Power transmission losses RAPDRP project is being undertaken which should benefit the whole state. Notably, the MSIDC areas especially Wardha industrial area should benefit. This should help Nagpur economy again. While State WAN is already in place a state Datacentre for all govt. offices is being planned. If this happens in Pune instead of Mumbai it will be nice. The world is becoming flat and in the coming years, education centres: Nagpur and Aurangabad belt should see mushrooming of IT associated BPO/Call centre industry due to avialable skill sets. So consumerism will touch these parts and as cash flows development projects in realty will come in here in addition to Pune and Nashik.. BOO model will bring new Roads which will initiate new transport Hubs like Kolhapur. Buddhist Tourism will give a new boast to Aurangabad.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.