Do not let custody row adversely affect child: HC

Justice Endlaw,however,realised that the parents had least regard towards the impact their differences were having on the child.

“This court can only express regret at such attitude. The parents,even if having mutual differences and incompatibility,have the duty to permit the least impact on the child. The child ought to be permitted to grow with the mutual affection of both parents; the parents ought not to instigate the child against each other and/or to spite the other,ought not to attempt to show the other down in the presence of or through reference before,the child,” he said.

Criticising the attitude of the parents,Justice Endlaw said they had forgotten that for the child’s development,“love,affection,companionship,guidance” of both parents is essential.

“They forget that their roles as spouses and as parents are entirely different. They allow the same to merge,which can only be to the detriment of the child,” he said.

Play positive role,lawyers told
The court also regretted the fact that the Bar was taking up guardianship cases just as any other fiercely contested adversarial litigation.

Calling upon lawyers to play a positive role,the High Court said,“Rather than advising their respective clients to take up accusatory and aggressive positions,they ought to apply a soothing balm to the aching hearts with which the parents reach them.”

“Instead of advising their clients that the child should not meet the other parent at all,they should advise them to allow the child to meet and interact with both parents freely and also explain that such an approach bears the imprimatur of the courts. If the members of the Bar play such a constructive role there will be no need to call the children to the courts,” it noted.

Passing its order,Justice Endlaw upheld the father’s visitation rights in the case and advised the couple that their focus should be to maintain a peaceful environment for the child in both homes to allow full cognitive development.