




Lord Paul has now alleged that he lost because the entire Indian delegation did not cast their votes in his favour. I wonder how he could take India’s support for granted and assume that because he was once an Indian national, all Indian delegates would vote for him on that basis alone, without taking other relevant factors into consideration.
It is important to note that the voting for the election of the chairman was by secret ballot. I have no personal knowledge as to how any delegate voted, Indian or otherwise. If Lord Paul’s assessment is correct, then by his own admission, sections of the Indian delegates may have voted for him, Hence, the deficit of 50 votes by which he lost, cannot—by any stretch of the imagination— be accounted for by the Indian delegation alone.
What is, however, most objectionable and reprehensible is that Lord Paul has had the temerity to insult Indians as a whole by crudely commenting that Indians can never be trusted. As a proud Indian, I repudiate the same totally and condemn it with all the emphasis at my command. It deserves to be dismissed with contempt. I expect that all Indians will do likewise. I would like to know of him that if Indians were really untrustworthy, why did he highlight his Indian origin in his appeal to the delegates?
... contd.


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications