Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Don’t mind your language

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The uncouth and un-Marathi display of hooliganism at the recent swearing-in ceremony in Maharashtra, where members of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) manhandled Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi, for taking his oath of office in Hindi as opposed to Marathi, betrayed a stark cultural disconnect with the aspirations of the average Marathi-speaking individual.

    Four duly elected members of the state legislative assembly, all belonging to the MNS, viz. Shishir Shinde, Ram Kadam, Ramesh Vanjale and Vasant Geete, were thereafter suspended by the House for having breached its highest traditions.

    The fact that popularly elected representatives would abandon their chance at five years of articulating the aspirations of their constituents through debate and discussion on the floor of the house, for a few shameful minutes of petty assault and battery, perhaps speaks volumes about intellectually bereft political posturing.

    Ads by Google

    Remarkably, the Indian Constitution mandates a penalty of five hundred rupees for each day that a duly elected representative assumes office without subscribing to the oath prescribed by the Third Schedule to the Constitution. The rare sight of a textually prescribed monetary penalty within the Indian Constitution underscores the sanctity of the oath of public office.

    Significantly, the oath prescribed by the Third Schedule for members of state legislative assemblies was amended by the Constitution (Sixteenth amendment) Act, 1963 to include a promise to “uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India”.

    By insisting that the oath of office should only be taken in Marathi, MNS chief Raj Thackeray ironically defeated the very ‘integrity’ of the country that the oath seeks to enshrine, for national integrity knows no linguistic chauvinism.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Covention and not constitutional rightsBy: Abhijit Bal | 12-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The issue is convention and not constitutional rights. What is the harm in taking oath in the local language if that is a convention? The violence must be condemned no doubt. One recalls Prime Minster Deve Gowda's speech on the independence day which he delivered in Hindi. The speech was written for him in Kannada script and the words made no sense to him. But nevertheless he followed a convention in whatever way he could. There should be no coercion but there is no great harm in learning local culture and language also. From my experience, I have often seen non-native people in Bengal and Maharashtra trying their best to stay away from the local culture and making fun of local customs. That is also not right. The same people would happily sit citizenship tests in USA, UK or Australia.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.