You are here: IE »   Story

Don’t write off one-dayers just yet

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    I suspect the only entity that’s got bashed around as much in recent times as the one-day international is the villain in the Hindi film (who, intriguingly, often gets flattened by a size zero heroine as well!). Reading some of the stuff you would have thought we were talking of crossbows and log tables and bats with linseed oil! So are we at a tipping point, is the gathering momentum weighty enough or is there too much fluff in it, are we merely filling newspaper space because we have to?

    I’d rather wait and see what the Champions’ Trophy, another much maligned format that is going through a makeover, throws up. With just eight teams, well, seven and a nationwide poll to find people who can bat and bowl making up the eighth, it offers much by way of competition. Sambit Bal, the editor of Cricinfo is right. You need to look at things in a certain context and the Champions’ Trophy in this format provides that context. It separates it from the otherwise wild mushrooming of one-day internationals.

    Ads by Google

    Shorn of their context, one-day games are a weaker offering. Put in the right ambience, they could be thrilling. It is a bit like the great violinist being ignored when he plays outside a subway station but being flattered with expensive tickets and applause when he plays in a theatre. Before writing an obituary we need to give the patient a good shot at survival.

    Having said that though the debate has thrown up a few interesting thoughts. Matthew Hayden thinks the middle overs, widely seen as the weak link, are actually the most interesting since they test a player’s skills greatly. And Peter Roebuck thinks we bring the problem onto ourselves by setting deep, defensive fields and making the single easy and attractive in the middle overs. It is an argument worth looking at. Why don’t captains attack a bit more after the power plays are over? In most games fielders are pushed back as soon as allowable; it’s as predictable as people responding to a fire alarm or a commentator throwing to a break! The moment you let ordinary bowlers bowl to ordinary fields, you get ordinary cricket. That is why the new power play rules are so good. They force captains to keep the fielders in, perforce then to attack. So here’s another theory. Attacking captains will bring the zing back into one-day cricket.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Tendulkar stated the same thing.By: N.Swaminathan | 17-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward I believe the Sachin Tendulkar's statement of splitting one day format into 25 overs each as innings will equal opportunity for both the teams irrespective of winning the Toss. In some places like Premadasa stadium in Colombu always favour the team which wins the toss due to climatic conditions etc. Sachin's did not say two innings has to be from the start - otherwise there will not be any opportunity for the 3rd down to the last player of the team to bat on. If Sachin's formula is tried, we will come to know how much interest it will generate which will help to sustain ODI for ever.
    The time to experiment is NOWBy: Sekhar | 12-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Whatever changes to ODIs the ICC is mulling,it has to implement them right away ASAP.Tweak around with the ODIs now and leave the Test and T20 formats alone.The ICC has decided to experiment and that's a good sign.
    Revitalising ODIsBy: Subhash Joshi | 12-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward 1. ODIs should be played in 2 parts each and not 2 innings. 2.Part 1. Team A bats 25 overs, then Team B bats 25 overs. 3.Part 2. Team A resumes from where it left after first 25 overs, Team B completes its remaining 25 overs.4.Advantages - undue toss advantage is neutralised, no player will play twice and all players will have to bat (unless some players remain not out.)In a day and night match both teams will get to play in both day and night time. 5. Both teams will get to adjust their batting/bowling strategies. In the present set up the the team batting first does not know 'how much and how fast' to score. 6. Crowds will enjoy more as you know how the teams are relatively placed at the end of Part1. I repeat - play in 2 parts each and not 2 innings each.Request all to share comments. Especially requesting Mr.Bhogle to share his views on this suggestion in his Indian Express Columns. Regards,
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.