Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Drafting Diplomacy: Pandit Nehru and his Menon

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    As the Lok Sabha debates the drafting skills of Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh this week, here is a story on joint statements from Jawaharlal Nehru's days.

    One of Nehru's close political associates was a Menon whose first name was Krishna. As India's relations with China turned sour in the late 1950s, Defence Minister Krishna Menon was caught in the eye of Delhi's political cyclone.

    As he reflected on the tragedy of Sino-Indian relations a few years later, Menon remembered objecting to the bad drafting of the now famous Panchsheel agreement when it was signed by Nehru and Chinese premier Zhou Enlai in 1954.

    Menon's reputation as a wordsmith was legendary and his rhetorical skills were awesome. Krishna Menon felt "the five points, as you can see, are not very well drafted... It is tautological in places, repetitive, and not very well constructed."

    Ads by Google

    When Menon complained, Nehru said, "what does it matter; it isn't a treaty or anything, it's a preface to this Tibetan business". (See Michael Brecher, India and World Politics: Krishna Menon's View of the World, Bombay, Oxford University Press, 1968, pp. 142-43.)

    Nehru's advice not to read too much into Panchsheel might shock the 'Nehruvians' of our time. Menon, then the leading Nehru acolyte, had a good understanding what Panditji was saying.

    Menon affirmed that Panchsheel "came out of in the course of a conversation (between Nehru and Zhou). It was rather like a communiqué. It was not a revelation. It was not a creed or part of a formulation of our foreign policy."

    ... contd.

    Next123
    What is all this, a tamasha?By: Sukumar Pradhan | 17-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward This is a total mockery of all the valued priciples of foreign diplomacy, ruling a country, taking care of millions of people etc. And the subtle way in which this supposedly learned man, CR Mohan is trying to cover it up is most pathetic. This is not reporting but eyewashing en masse of the cheapest level. We knew Nehru was bloody stupid,he bent backwards before Jinnah, gave away a large chunk of our country and a whole of Tibet to the Chinese for preactically nothing. He was the worst coward we ever had (albeit he is shown differently in "Gandhi", what a pity) and as this C R Mohan puts it, Krishna menon being an acolyte of Nehru was part and parcel of the 1962 debacle. Both of them were more interested in the language part of the failed "Panchsheel". Nehru was not even interested in what it really portrayed, what a tragedy. It is only by the grace of god that we are still alive
    Better this timeBy: Kalidas M | 17-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Raja M has done better here than his other article "Jaswant, Jinnah
    The truth be told ...By: Manoj Basu | 06-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward If Mohan is to be believed, then no agreements done between nations have any value as it can be concoted. How can governments be trusted?
    Shame on CRajaBy: Rohit | 06-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward CRaja's articles are crap. They continously reflect his political affiliations than a neutral stand. He forgets the outcome of Panchsheel and wants us to forget that the outcome of SES draft can be disastrous. The first Menon and Nehru with congress are collectively responsible for murder of > 3000 Indian soilders. The Atal Bihari Vajpayee led government was a shaky one and LK Advani is no more than advertisement speaks but that does not mean that stand should be diluted. The fact is that current Indo Pak talk has been forced by US... Balochistan has been forced into joint statement by US... Sometime down the line US would be brokering Kashmir and CRaja would forget what he wrote to his convinience. The right thing to say is Indian leaders from MK Gandhi to MMS (with exception of Narsimha Rao) have been spineless, lacking moral integrity to be courageous and men of straw. With such leaders, future of country is decided by fate.
    drafting diplomacyBy: mohan | 06-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward mr mohan has written a true picture of indian opposition be they be bjp or communist nit picking on draft words.the draft means very little if tomorrow pakistan stats suppoting terroist in pakistan to act againt india including kashmir. every thing previous drafts will become null and void there is no victor . priminister has to be congrduled for tring his best to solve indo pakistan problem.if pakistanwnats to go on creating problems india can say enogh is enough we will not even discuss any other matter india can play other cards if necessary (afganistanwhere india can OFFER indian military personale to the nato forces and afghan govt will accept . knowing pakistan they are sure to repeatwith or wthout govt knowledgesome stupid act againstindia bjp did notsolve kashmir problem let manmohan singh try his level best. no priminister of indiacangivr kashmir to pakistanso let opposition stop nitpicking.(may bethe oppositionshould make it mandatory for govtgehave treaty in indian langua
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.