Indeed, in two of the three districts in the Valley that went to the polls, the number of people turning out to vote was probably close to, if not more than, the number that did so in the 2002 elections. This is a moment to savour — regardless of one’s opinion on the Valley’s past and destined future.

Which is how the clear interest in elections should be viewed as well. On the one hand, those who claimed that the recent, prominent, visibility of separatist sentiment meant that keeping Kashmiris involved in the Indian state’s mechanisms was impossible are clearly discredited. On the other, nobody should think, as they began to last time round, that a high turnout means that everything’s hunky-dory, that separatist politics has been defeated. It means that people have at least developed a firm belief that “local issues” — roads, electricity, sewage — need accountability at the state level, and the Indian constitutional framework can provide that. What’s more, it might mean that “local issues” can keep people involved in the democratic process, keeping them interested in the constitutional structures that knit India together, can slowly accustom them to expecting representation of the sort that all parts of India are provided.

So, as we read reports of people lining up at the freezing dawn to exercise their rights, as we look at photographs — chilly compositions, mixing the grey of dirty snow and the brown of old, patched phirans, but warmed by the expectant, unexpected hope in the voters’ eyes — perhaps a certain cautious optimism is justified. This is why, the objections of mainstream parties notwithstanding, postponing elections would have been a mistake. One day, Kashmir will be normal again; to hasten that day, the rest of India has to start treating it as normal whenever it can — and we must never underestimate the drawing power of being able to fix drains.