Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Dreaming a bad dream

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    Domestically Mrs Gandhi’s tenure as Prime Minister served mostly to create huge problems in Punjab and Kashmir without solving those that already existed in the Northeastern states. When Rajiv Gandhi became Prime Minister one of the first things he did was to try to bring peace in these troubled states. Had he been wise and allowed a free election in Jammu & Kashmir in 1986 we may not have had a Kashmir problem today. But, he was young and Mummy’s old advisers told him to force an alliance with the National Conference, which turned into a political suicide pact for both parties.

    If during this time of terrible political instability dear Dream Prime Minister had been building up the Indian economy through wise policies and through simply paying attention to the changes taking place in Southeast Asia we may still have been alright. But, even as our old enemy China opened its moribund communist economy to foreign investment and capitalist ideas,

    Ads by Google

    Mrs Gandhi kept India’s wrapped in red tape, state controls and central planning. It was such a bizarre time that industrialists who produced more than the quotas allotted to them were treated like criminals. Her devoted daughter-in-law recently said bank nationalisation was the reason why India had not been affected by the international financial meltdown. This is nonsense. Bank nationalisation kept Indian banks in a prolonged dark age until foreign banks arrived to show them how much they needed to change.

    The poor found it just as hard to get loans from nationalised banks as from private ones. Only governments benefited and they borrowed and spent recklessly. Mrs Gandhi’s family continues to speak of the ‘the poor’ as if they were the only ones who cared for them. The truth is that if Rahul Gandhi were truly in touch with life in the real India he would not need to spend the night in a Dalit hut to find out how bad things are.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Well said.By: Jasnaam Singh | 12-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward I completely believe you, Tavleen. Indira was not good for India. She did not treat the kings and minor races of India nicely after they did give away their ancestral lands. I agree with everything you said.
    SumeghaBy: sumegha Gulati | 17-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward A well written article.However,there are 2 points where I feel u need reconsideraion.First,"bangladesh is turning into a centre for JIHAD".Jihad is a beautiful,sensible phenomenon of Islam.The sendse in which the word has been used here is negative.Jihad isnt a wroing pgenomena;but it has been misinterpreted by some muslim fanatics.Secondly,there is nothing called "ISALAMIST TERRORISTS".The word Islam means peace.hoe can terrorists be peaceful?can we,logically speaking,have a term called "peaceful terrorits".It would be misnomer.Anyways, these things apart, ur article about the "so-called achievenments" of gandhis is great.
    Indira was bad for India.By: HM | 15-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Indira was a bad leader and a worse person for having broken the promies made to the Royals of India at Independance. Indian Royals gave away their ancestral lands to be part of the undivided India. They were promised two things - 1) Congress will take care of ALL of India 2) The privy purses and titles of the kings will be maintained. Indira broke both promises.Kings gave up everything for a united India and in return they got bad publicity through gov education system and gov controled "media". Constitutional promises were broken and sadly, no one ever mentions this break in faith.Indira's emergency was a terrible time for India. Sadly, too many Indians choose to forget their history. Sadly, this means they will be forced to relive it again and again till they learn its lessons.What happened after her death was terrible news for the Sikhs of Dehli. Sadly, they too have chosen to forget the genocide congress indulged in.Indira was, is and will be bad news for India.
    Mr.By: Chimanlal Pujara | 08-May-2009 Reply | Forward How refreshing to come across a journalist prepared to express views so widely shared but rarely articulated. The anchors of NDTV and IBN, among others, should be required to read more and speak (or shout)less.
    true...true..true..By: siddharth | 07-May-2009 Reply | Forward well said...in a time when the english media is hailing Rahul Gandhi as the greatest champion of india's poor since mother teresas. its refreshing to read Tavleen's article..thanks
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.