Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Dynastic democracy is fashionable

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • It might come as bad news for the Congress Party but this seems to be the general view. Rahul Gandhi has given more televised press conferences in the past week than in his entire political career and the consensus is that he has a sulky quality that is not attractive. In the words of one observer, “He looks like he is about to storm off in a sulk followed by a couple of ayahs.”

    Unlike his sister, Rahul-baba has difficulties with the native tongue. He finds it hard to form a sentence that is not filled with English words that the ‘aam aadmi’ cannot possibly understand. When he tried explaining why he invited the British Foreign Secretary to spend the night in a village hut he said he wanted to ‘showcase’ not India’s poverty but the ‘shakti’ of India’s poor. Tch, tch, tch. Along with some Hindi lessons he needs to learn not to patronise people who have no choice but to be poor. It is not about ‘shakti’ but about survival.

    Ads by Google

    How does it matter? The Chairman of Indian National Congress private limited has decided that it will be her son and not her daughter who will be the next Managing Director. Besides, dynastic democracy is now an epidemic. Everyone from the lowliest village official to the regional satrap has seen that a career in politics is the quickest way to build a family business. So a seat in the Lok Sabha is now a fiefdom to be passed down in the family and nearly all our political parties are now private limited companies.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Our inabilityBy: Dinesh prabhu | 14-May-2009 Reply | Forward Every political party's president has heir-apparent in waiting. All the subordinates have no option but support the heir-apperent. In turn the subordinates give their position to their son/daughter... I guess we, people can do little in this regard
    Democratic Reforms...By: Manojk | 11-May-2009 Reply | Forward Stupid anchors and shallow TV people deserve stupid dynasty in which no one can even graduate without difficulty. Secondly, no one elected Sonia or Rahul. The kind of Governance we have is due to the fact that we have a system of democracy where by leaders are nominated or imposed. It is the bankruptcy of this disgusting Dynasty and COMMIES that we are not having a dialogue on how to reform our democracy. When Vajpayee suggested we should have at least debated that issue along with Term limits and Priamries where candidates are not imposed by central committees rather than selected by people who can represent their party in the election. Imagine that people register for Congress or BJP or CPM. Then they come out and select who they want to represent their party for their constituency. Each party chooses their best candidate and they all run for MLA/MP. No nomination by party committees. This will greatly reform our democracy.
    I'm horrified at myselfBy: Zaf | 11-May-2009 Reply | Forward I'm horrified at myself, but I find myself quite liking Priyanka. And the fact that she has good taste in saris (like her Grandmother, and in fact mother) is not completely responsible. I am absolutely against the dynastic principle when it comes to governing a country, but despite this I have a soft spot for Nehru's great grand-daughter (and sons, even the fat greedy one, though he's pushing it these days) - and I think I am not alone in this contradictory stance. Perhaps democracy ameliorates the negatives of dynasty, because in India, it's the dynasty that is on trial at every election, and the dynasty can be (and has been) both thrown out and rehired. The election is the ultimate box office, and the people seem to like some version of dynasty - so long as they are elected.
    True National Leader(s)By: Murtaza Arzai | 11-May-2009 Reply | Forward I agree with your point, but how can a political leader survive the onslaught he/she faces from leftist JNU/JMI educated media who is on a dole-out from CONgress (via advertisements and Padmashree awards)? NDtv, CNN-ibn, TOI and the likes indulge in character assassiantion of non-Nehru dynasty leaders - Take Advani (fake hawala charges), NaMo (unproven riot allegations), etc.
    Dynastic politics, feudal system has great future in India.By: Jay | 10-May-2009 Reply | Forward India will get the quality of leader it deserves! It's not the "leader” but the people are responsible. "Education” and degrees are nothing but farce in India which can make only clerks (be it IT, management, scientist etc); good only to carry out orders. So dynastic politics, feudal system has great future here. May God save the country!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.