Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Enjoyer of an office of super-profit

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Sudheendra Kulkarni

    Prophetic words. Distillation of 50 years of parliamentary experience plus that rare sixth sense. Now you see why, after Dr Manmohan Singh’s Cabinet burnt midnight oil over giving final touches to the ordinance, it dropped the idea like a hot potato the very next day. Caught red-handed, many worthies in the Government are claiming that promulgating an ordinance (first broken by a bombshell-of-a-report by R Venkataraman in this paper) had never crossed their minds, that it’s only a figment of the opposition’s imagination, and that Parliament was adjourned sine die only because it had completed all its listed business.

    Another lie. Passage of the Finance Bill is not the only business of the Budget session. Many issues of national importance are waiting to be discussed by parliamentarians; after all, that’s what the people have elected them for.

    But a far bigger lie was enacted on Thursday afternoon at 10 Janpath, with all the theatrics of a cunning political plot. In announcing her resignation, Sonia Gandhi sanctimoniously said that she was ‘‘hurt’’ by some people ‘‘creating an atmosphere in the country as if the Government and Parliament were being used only for my benefit’’. Soniaji, every verifiable fact about what your own party and government functionaries were doing from morning till midnight the previous day goes to prove that the Government and Parliament were indeed being used mainly for your benefit.

    Ads by Google

    The ‘‘benefit’’ accruing from the ordinance to other MPs facing disqualification for holding offices of profit was of secondary consideration for your strategists. And don’t tell us that you knew nothing, and had not approved, of their strategy (of getting Parliament closed and preparing an ordinance). Which is why, during your deliberately brief press interaction, you cleverly evaded questions about the ordinance and Parliament’s adjournment, questions that could have put you on the mat.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.