Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Ensuring nothing but the truth

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Perjury, as we have seen in cases like the Jessica Lal murder, can seriously subvert the course of justice, even while the perjurer is allowed to get away with impunity. As far as the law is concerned, there is no lacuna. Perjury is a penal offence under sections 193 to 195 of the Indian Penal Code. Section 195 (b) of Criminal Procedure Code prescribes that no court shall take cognisance of perjury under section 193 to 195 IPC except on the complaint in writing of the court. But the procedure is somewhat convoluted and long-drawn. Section 344 CrPC, however, provides an alternative summary procedure empowering the court of sessions or magistrate to try the witness summarily and sentence the perjurer to imprisonment, which may extend up to three months or a fine of Rs 500 or with both. But the provision is seldom resorted to by the courts. Indeed, the response of the courts in dealing with the serious problem of perjury has bordered on indifference.

    In the US, in contrast, perjury under federal laws invites a sentence of five years imprisonment. In the state of New York, the sentence has been raised to 15 years. Several prominent people have been convicted for perjury in western countries, something that is unheard of in India. They include Jeffrey Archer, British novelist and parliamentarian, Jonathan Atkins, British politician and member of John Major’s cabinet, and, more recently, Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby, former aide to US Vice President, Dick Cheney, who was convicted on two counts of perjury along with other offences in connection with Palme Affairs.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    perjuryBy: R.Thyagarajan | 05-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward There are three things that a judge before whom a pejury case comes looks for1. Whether the initial statement by a respondent or a witness is is proved by an applicant to be false one2. whether the false staement is made by the respondent is with in his knowledge the statement is false.3. whether the applicant is made to loose meterially or monitorily a great loss by the false statement. Some judges take the first two condition as sufficient while some insist the third condition.In Indian courts the Perjury cases do come up rarely and the courts take the perjury statements as suitable to be considered only to help either respondent or applicant on the final verdict and not as a seperate case. When one is free untill othewise found guity before law, if courts sart taking perjury cases, there should be a seperate judge in Idian courts to deal with them.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.