Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Errors of commission

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Even after setting up a commission and appointing a judge to head it, governments do everything possible to impede its work. To begin with, no proper place is made available for holding the proceedings. Requisite staff and other infrastructure are denied or indefinitely delayed. Unless the presiding officer has the tenacity of an English pit-bull, and the epidermis of a pachyderm, no headway can be made for months on end.

    Then, there starts the mindgame of conjuring up all manners of obstacles in its smooth functioning. Relevant documents are not produced by officers on vague and often frivolous pleas of state privilege, material witnesses are not produced. One is amazed at the manner in which the state, which solemnly set up the commission, finds ways and means to retard its work. To add to the difficulty, every conceivable political party utilises the opportunity to extract maximum political mileage. Busybodies suddenly wake up and rush forward to heap unsolicited advice, even if well meant, and burden the record of the commission with tonnes of material of least relevance. Most are represented by lawyers who leave no stone unturned to milk the occasion to garner fame and riches. Forensic pleas, mostly frivolous, are flung at the judge; cross-examination is conducted ad nauseam; adjournments are frequently sought on the convenience of counsel, illness of witnesses and myriad other excuses, old and new.

    Ads by Google

    The unrealistic timeframe given by the government to complete the inquiry soon ends and many extensions are sought and given liberally by the government. Fading public memory helps in blotting out the very momentous reason for which the commission was set up. Finally, when the lionhearted do produce a report, it is placed on the floor of the House on the last day of the session with an Action Taken Report with insufficient copies printed and not distributed rendering impossible any meaningful debate on its contents. Time, talent and public funds are wasted in each such exercise. Cynics snigger, wags smile, and the debate about the futility of the exercise continues.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Falling on deaf ears!!?By: Vandana | 03-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The article was so good.Seriously the country is in dire need of reforms and changes in all sectors which involve the legislature itself. The commissions' reports are reduced to mere jokes. I was surprised when Justice Liberhan was saying again and again how free a man he is now..as if he had been under the political knife for the past so many years...clearly he was and so were others...and who knows all the work could again go down the drain...the UPA govt..or the congress to be precise doesnt have a very good record of implementing the enquiry committees' recommendations and enforcing into laws...We can just hope that the perpetrators of civil riots and sectarianism in India are punished to the core.By manipulating the working of the committees, the govt. is playing with the emotions of the people of India..people cannot be befooled for long..the govt. must take action if it doesn't want to see anothr civil riot eruptin in the country due to its own negligence towards bringin justice
    Hang LiberhanBy: Girija Shanker | 02-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Frankly anybody who is capable of discussing and analyzing a particularly issue or problem for such a long time with - of course - no results has to be a great scientist or a parasite for govt funds that are released for such meetings. With Mr. Liberhan, I'll settle for latter without much thought. Clearly in any other country this wouldn't have happened and even if it did - by a freak incident - this person would have simply sent to gallows to rot for rest of his life. But of course, we're in India - the motherhood of all bureaucrazy.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.