EU parliament tightens rules on ratings agencies
Related
Top Stories
- IPL spot-fixing case: Actor Vindoo Dara Singh arrested in Mumbai
- Supreme Court rules out ban on IPL matches, slams BCCI over spot-fixing
- Li Keqiang pitches for more Chinese investments as he backs trade balance
- Narendra Modi holds talks with Advani ahead of BJP's strategy meeting in Delhi
- Aarushi murder case: HC rejects Talwars' plea to examine 14 witnesses
The European Parliament today voted through higher transparency standards for credit ratings agencies which many blame for exacerbating the eurozone debt crisis.
Under the new regulations, agencies such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch, will have to be much more open in their deliberations and could face legal proceedings if found at fault in their work.
Parliament voted through the legislation with 579 votes in favour, 58 against, after MEPs and the European Commission in November negotiated tightened rules which watered down some of the more radical proposals but still gave supervisors new bite.
EU Internal Markets Commissioner Michel Barnier said the changes "will considerably improve the quality of ratings."
The agencies "will have to be more transparent when rating sovereign states and will have to follow stricter rules which will make them more accountable for mistakes in case of negligence or intent," Barnier said in a statement.
The new rules should improve competition in an industry dominated by the top three, reduce the agencies' influence, eliminate conflicts of interest and make the companies liable to legal redress, he said.
The changes followed uproar in Europe over successive ratings downgrades at key turning points in the eurozone crisis which added to the difficulties governments faced in trying to stabilise their finances.
A downgrade in a country or company's rating marks an increase in risk and typically increases their borrowing costs as a result, an added burden at a time when financial markets were reluctant to lend to weaker eurozone states.
The ratings agencies say in their defence that they are a crucial player, helping investors better assess risk and reward, especially at times of turmoil.
Their critics charge that the agencies instead exploited the upheaval, stoking volatility by changing their rating assessments at key moments in the debt crisis as eurozone governments floundered.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks
- Google Maps leads Chinese man abducted 23 years ago back home


Target tests if Facebook-driven deals bring shoppers into stores
HSBC bank fears 'significant' penalty in NRI tax evasion probe
iPhone helps Deutsche Telekom US customer numbers
China calls US the "real hacking empire" after Pentagon report




















