Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Exposingtheleft.blog is dangerous

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Clearly, the government has a lot to handle since the seven serial blasts in Mumbai last Tuesday. Banning America’s anti-Left website ExposingTheLeft.Blogspot.Com is a start.

    Viewed through pkblogs.com, a website that helps you bypass the official Indian ban (its home page invites you if your blog is blocked in India, Pakistan, Iran or China), ExposingTheLeft.Blogspot.Com makes only one reference to Mumbai, which is: ‘‘At least 131 killed in India train bombings: More humanitarian acts from the ‘Religion of Peace’.’’

    This may be offensive and so could the rest of this website—but largely for anti-Bush voters in the United States as it tracks domestic politics, takes several swipes at Iran, applauds a court ruling against same-sex marriages, and slams the Hizbollah. It has little to do with what Comrade Prakash Karat was thinking about or doing on 7/11.

    ExposingTheLeft’s editors are aware of India’s gag order and their new post is: “Well, it’s not a fatwa but I suppose it will have to do.’’

    Ads by Google

    Government officials today defended their action against the three blogspot.com sites and eight other websites they have ordered Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block from Indian viewers. Several Department of Telecom officials, contacted through the day, declined to comment. An official in charge of cybersecurity said: “Google should take the initiative to block sites that are offensive to us. If it doesn’t, we have to take such action.”

    All banned blogs are being hosted on a website that Google owns. The websites are hosted both in India and abroad, which complicates matters, since bloggers are being forced out of their blogs because of the ban.

    ‘‘There are ways to bypass the ban which makes it ineffectual, but there’s another complication, it’s not easy for India to block blogs selectively if they are not hosted here,’’ says Supreme Court lawyer Pavan Duggal.

    The effort to ban is also out of tune with a new Amnesty International attempt supported by Republicans in the US to help sites like Yahoo! resist censorship attempts abroad.

    The other blogspot sites that the Government ordered a ban on: CommonFolkCommonSense.blogspot.com and PajamaEditors.blogspot.com, which plays on the word Mujahadeen (Pajama-hadeen).

    Curiously, a fourth blogspot site, PrincessKimberly.blogspot.com, is on the Government’s blacklist. It hosts only a woman’s rantings over how she ‘‘is bored.’’

    Mypetjava.mu.nu, another site in the gag order, is still up and running but Hinduhumanrights.com/hindufocus.html is gone as is Dalitstan.org, which the world outside India can see refers to ‘‘Brahmin Indira Gandhi’’ and other personalities who have been ‘‘at war’’ with India’s Dalits.

    RahulYadav.com, viewed through a search engine, displays aspirations to ‘‘liberate’’ Kashmiri Hindus, and is gone too.

    Several experts pointed out that India was not alone in trying cyberspace censorship but India’s position is slightly muddled by the fact that the Information Technology Act, 2000, is silent on blogs or blogging. Officials in the Ministry of Information Technology cite a July 14, 2003 gazette notification that gives the government rights to restrict access to the Internet.

    The notification lists five parameters that can allow blocking of websites, which include threats to sovereignty, security of the country, friendly relations with another nation, public order or to prevent a cognizable offense.

    The blacklist

    The restricted blogs and web sites sent to ISPs:

    pajamaeditor.blogspot.com

    exposingtheleft.blogspot.com

    princesskimberly.blogspot.com

    commonfolkcommonsense.blogspot

    mypetjava.mu.nu

    thepirateco.us

    hinduhumanrights.com/hindufocus.html

    rahulyadav.com

    dalitstan.com

    macker-old.com

    merrimusings.typepad.com

    India-born entrepreneurs empower US votersBy: timothy | 04-Nov-2008 Reply | Forward Shukoor Ahmed ran for a seat in the Maryland House of Delegates in 1998, after coming to America a decade earlier from Hyderabad, India. Campaigning door-to-door, he was surprised so many voters did not know who represented them! After his race ended slightly short of victory, he took advantage of his Master’s degree in Computer Technology and Political Science to build StateDemocracy.org, a website he launched in 2001 to connect citizens and lawmakers. His website’s motto encapsulated its mission:
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.