Family goes to court: ‘That’s our land, not mangroves’
- IPL spot-fixing case: Net widens, police watching 3 more players, other bookies
- IPL 2013: Imperious Brad Hodge powers Rajasthan Royals to qualifier
- Sonia Gandhi, PM Manmohan Singh slam BJP for disrupting Parliament, stalling bills
- IPL spot-fixing: 'Bookie' Vindoo was close to BCCI chief's son-in-law, say cops
- Jessica Lall case: Shayan Munshi to face perjury trial
Owners of a 174-hectare plot in Borivali-Dahisar have moved Bombay High Court seeking damages of Rs 1,000 crore from the state for illegally declaring their land as a mangrove forest.
Krishnadevi Kamathia and eight others have contended that they are the heirs of Malchand Chandulal and Bhagwatilal Gangulal who purchased the property at an auction on December 18, 1956, and set up 'Srinivas Salt Works' to manufacture salt.
In the suit filed through their constituted attorney Jayesh Shah, director of Ravi Jyoti Finance and Leasing Pvt Ltd, the plaintiffs have urged the court to declare null and void three documents: a July 27, 1997 letter of the collector, Mumbai Suburban to the principal secretary, revenue department; a state government notification of February 18, 2009; and a report of the state's Grievance Redressal Committee, purportedly from June 15, 2009.
According to the plaintiffs, the collector's letter said the land was "mangrove forests", the notification listed the land as "forest", and the report reiterated that the land was "mangrove forest".
The suit says the plaintiffs learnt of the notification of February 18, 2009, issued by the divisional commissioner, Konkan Region, in March 2009. According to the suit, the notification declared their land "erroneously, wrongfully, illegally, without following due process of law and contrary to the provisions of law" as a "forest".
The suit claims that the salt pans still exist, though they are "not operational for some time due to disputes between the deputy salt commissioner, Bombay, and the plaintiffs and various other persons". The "accidental and/or spontaneous growth of some vegetation... due to temporary discontinuance of production... of salt... cannot result in the said property being termed or treated as a forest".
The plaintiffs have said that buildings have come up on properties adjoining their plot; hence the declaration of the land as 'forest' is arbitrary.
- Paddy shortfall blamed for mystery death of procurement officer
- 'Bookie' Vindoo was close to BCCI chief’s son-in-law: cops
- Net widens, police watching three more players, new set of bookies
- Suspected Islamists behead soldier on London street
- Malegaon 2006 case: NIA names four right wing terror suspects
- BJP invokes 'sarcasm, ridicule' against PM