skip to content
Premium
This is an archive article published on September 17, 2011
Premium

Opinion Far from the Truth

News TV keeps a straight face,somehow.

indianexpress

Mihir S. Sharma

September 17, 2011 02:14 AM IST First published on: Sep 17, 2011 at 02:14 AM IST

This past week,news television managed to be repetitive even by its own standards. On Times Now,for example,it was All Modi,All The Time. You could conceivably imagine that Narendra Modi was already prime minister,and Times Now his Doordarshan — if,that is,you’re the sort of person who would call that a pleasant daydream. The News Hour examined,on successive days: “Is it a clean chit?”; “Modi’s Legal Fight”; “Modi verdict impact”; “Modi hits back”; “Rahul vs Modi”; and “Fight of the fasts”.

Meanwhile,Anna Hazare,worried news TV might forget him,told all the Dilliwallahs to come to Ralegan Siddhi where he’d give them a strengthening vegetarian thali while they waited to chat. And wait they would,because every TV channel on the I&B Ministry’s books turned up. Somebody,switching channels in horror,counted and discovered that Hazare gave 17 interviews in under 12 hours. What is truly extraordinary is that even in the middle of this interview profligacy,every channel still screamed it was “exclusive”. Headlines Today even called theirs “Anna’s first interview”,when,by my reckoning,it was about the third that hour. At some point news channels are going to have to wake up to the fact that if they deceive us so obviously,spectacularly and regularly about things like exclusives,people are going to have a hard time believing much else they claim.

Advertisement

But the highlight of the week was Left,Right and Centre on NDTV,where they dissected Jacqueline Kennedy’s half-century-old diss of Indira Gandhi. Mrs Gandhi’s secretary,R.K. Dhawan was on air,looking as purse-lipped as Kennedy accused Mrs Gandhi of being,and said of the statements: “Very disparaging,far from the truth,and I have no hesitation to say they are worth being thrown in waste-paper basket.” He paused,then added: “Far from truth,totally uncalled-for,rather very disparaging — and far from the truth.”

Dhawan’s co-panelists — Praveen Swamy,Swapan Dasgupta and Padma Rao — had been lulled into a near-comatose state by the rhythmic repetitiveness of Dhawan’s measured statement. In the next few seconds,though,in the funniest TV moment you’ll see this month,their eyes went wide,they sat up straight,and then they collapsed in did-he-just-say-that laughter.

For Dhawan,having established to the best of his ability that Kennedy’s statements were — what was it? ah yes — far from the truth,proceeded to shift gears smoothly. With the practised ease that must come after years of experience with a major political party’s dirty-tricks centre,he moved from Stout Defence to Attacking Character of Critic. Unfortunately,instead of suggesting that,say,Jacqueline Kennedy had a problem with stronger women like Indira Gandhi,he chose to say: “I think one should not forget that Mrs Kennedy herself,having abandoned the prestige of the family after the death of her husband,ran after money !” [Suppressed laughter throughout studio. Panellists giggling,bug-eyed. “She married very old,very rich person. So that you can imagine,the thinking of a person.”

Advertisement

Dhawan then informed us that the reason that Kennedy was vicious about Mrs Gandhi in 1963 was that Indira Gandhi,in turn,spoke firmly to Nixon in 1970. The Congress party’s current thinking on the subject of Mrs Gandhi,clearly,is that she was such a superwoman that her words could irritate people immensely even before she said them. The normal laws of space-time are no bar,the Congress believes,to Mrs Gandhi’s ability to piss people off.

Nidhi Razdan,the anchor,thanked Dhawan and went to the panel,which she said,in a voice that shook ever so slightly,was “fascinated by what he said”. (Fascination,for me,tends to involve less giggling.) Rao,Dasgupta and Swamy,who looked like they were trying out to represent India at the Smirking event in the Olympics,rose to the occasion manfully. Dasgupta,for example,eyed photographs of Kennedy’s 1962 visit to India,and declared that Nehru was “clutching” Kennedy in all of them; remembered Nehru “had a certain partiality for attractive Caucasians”,apparently distinguishing him from every other Indian male,ever; and concluded that Nehru’s daughter naturally disapproved of the PM’s “fawning”. History through Page-3 captioning.

Keeping a straight face throughout was not made easier by NDTV’s irritating habit of not turning off sound from their accompanying visuals completely. Since one of the videos on a loop was of Kennedy on an elephant,Dhawan’s statements harmonised perfectly with the elephant’s self-important trumpeting.

Whenever the camera gave up on the helplessly giggling panelists,it would drift back to Razdan,who managed to sit straight-backed and solemn,a respectful expression on her face,and not the glimmer of a giggle in sight. Ah,news anchors are truly a more perfect breed of men and women. Or possibly they’ve just heard everything by now.

mihir.sharma@expressindia.com

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Edition
Install the Express App for
a better experience
Featured
Trending Topics
News
Multimedia
Follow Us