Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Faulty maternal, neonatal death registration in Gujarat: IIM study

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Even as the state government claims to have successfully brought down maternal and infant mortality rates after the implementation of the Chiranjeevi scheme, a survey by the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (IIM-A) reveals under reporting of such deaths and faulty registration.

    Titled Saving mothers and newborns through an innovative partnership with private sector obstetricians: Chiranjeevi Scheme of Gujarat, India’, the report calls for a foolproof system in place for detailed registration of maternal and infant mortality in Gujarat.

    “The Chiranjeevi scheme has been fairly successful and there is evidence of substantial reduction in mortality rate in the state with easy access to obstetricians in the rural areas. But there are instances when deaths are not recorded by the doctors, which make it difficult to get a clear picture of the scheme’s impact. There is a need for better recording of maternal and neonatal deaths,” said project researcher, IIM-A Prof Dileep Mavalankar.

    Ads by Google

    The study is a compilation of the state’s mortality reports prepared by the government from January 2006 to December 2008, tallied with the mortality report of the Registrar General of India (RGI).

    As per the analysis, only 52 maternal deaths were reported, as against 588 deaths out of 2,69,942 deliveries in the absence of the Chiranjeevi scheme.

    On the same lines, only 1,061 neonatal deaths were reported as against 10,798 deaths among 2,69,942 deliveries consideraing a Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR) of 40, the data revealed.

    “We had taken a special survey conducted by RGI as the base which calculated MMR of 202 in 1999-2001 and 172 in the 2001-03 survey. According to this we estimated MMR in 2007 to be around 97. Presuming that the MMR among the poor is 1.5 times more than the average mortality, we assume that the present MMR should have been around 218 instead of 52 as reported,” said Mavalankar.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.