FE Editorial : Painless extraction
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- India, China have wisdom to address bounday issue: Li Keqiang
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
Gas formula as well as new PSCs are a good idea
Apart from the fact that crude production has been falling for all of the last year—and gas for almost two years—two issues have dogged the country's oil exploration sector. The constant interference by the government in what should logically be the domain of the oil firms and, two, the government deciding on what prices of gas should be. Both have, to a large extent, been resolved by PMEAC chief C Rangarajan's report—whether the government accepts the report, especially on gas pricing, will depend upon what other ministries say since both electricity and fertiliser subsidies will be affected in a big way.
After explaining why a CAG audit and government permission is critical when it comes to firms doing exploration—since firms get to recover their costs first, any padding in costs affects government revenues—Rangarajan recognises that this is keeping investors away. The number of exploration blocks awarded is down from around 50 in NELP 6 to roughly a fifth in NELP 9—within this, the share of private operators is down equally sharply, from 70% in NELP 5 to 45% in NELP 9. So, Rangarajan has recommended the government move to a revenue-share arrangement with an upside for higher oil prices or unexpected production surprises—presumably this also applies to the downside. This happens in the existing arrangement as well, the only difference being firms get to recover all their costs first—so the contracts are for profit-shares. Theoretically, this will turn away investors since, in a non-oil-rich country like India, this could mean a greater risk for them. In reality, however, this is missing the woods for the trees. If there is no oil found, even under a cost-recovery model, a firm will not be able to recover the money it has invested in exploration. So, all that is needed in the new Rangarajan formula is to do some more discounting for the time it will take to get the oil/gas out. As to moving from the profit share to revenue-share mechanisms, that's pure maths—if profits shares are 30% and profits are 10% of revenue, the revenue-share bid will be for 3%.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


Rail Budget 2013: Slow train or fast train?
FE Edit: Punter’s Farewell


















