Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

'Fed moves to broker deal for Wachovia'

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Wachovia
    The US Federal Reserve is brokering discussions between Wells Fargo & Co and Citigroup. (AP)

    SATURDAY NIGHT IN CONNECTICUT

    Citigroup won a New York state court order late on Saturday that would have extended an agreement it had to negotiate exclusively with Wachovia. Citigroup lawyers met New York State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos in his home in Cornwall, Connecticut, with lawyers for the other two banks phoning in.

    An appeals court on Sunday overturned that order, in part because the decision was not made in New York. Citigroup plans to appeal that decision.

    Also on Sunday, Wachovia asked a federal judge for a temporary restraining order that would have prevented Citigroup from interfering with the Wells Fargo deal.

    US District Court Judge John Koeltl denied the request, but said the court will hear on Tuesday whether or not the exclusivity agreement that Citigroup says prevented Wells Fargo from making the bid for Wachovia is enforceable.

    Ads by Google

    Koeltl said Wells Fargo's argument appears to be valid. It is not likely he will preside over the hearing.

    Wachovia said on Sunday that its agreement with Wells Fargo is valid and proper, and is best for shareholders, employees and US taxpayers. Wells Fargo said in a statement it has a binding merger agreement with Wachovia, and its deal, which keeps Wachovia intact, is better for all of Wachovia's stakeholders.

    "We are confident that we will complete our announced merger with Wachovia," Wells Fargo said.

    Wachovia spokeswoman Christy Phillips-Brown said early Sunday: "Citigroup is always free to make a superior offer to Wachovia."

    One of the earliest effects of the $700 billion bailout legislation signed by US President George W. Bush last week could come in Wachovia's federal court case, which argues that a clause in the bill invalidates the exclusivity agreement signed with Citigroup.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.