You are here: IE »   Story

FinMin opposes IAF choice for refuelling aircraft

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping
    The Indian Air Force’s plan to acquire six new refuelling aircraft to give its fighters extended reach has hit a roadblock with the Finance Ministry questioning the selection of the European Airbus 330 MRTT aircraft that costs almost twice as much as its Russian built competitor.

    While two aircraft—the Airbus 330 MRTT and the Russian IL 78—had taken part in the global tender taken out in 2006 to provide six refuellers, the Air Force had recently selected the European platform after technical trials. This, despite the fact that India already has a fleet of six IL 78 tankers ordered from Uzbekistan in 2002.

    However, the Finance Ministry is said to have objected to the selection as the Airbus 330 MRTT deal would cost upwards of Rs 8,000 crore against the estimated budget of Rs 5,000 crore set by the Defence Ministry. On the other hand, the fleet of Russian built IL-78 would cost only Rs 4,800 crore.

    Ads by Google

    The Finance Ministry has pointed out that India already has a fleet of the IL 78 refuellers, making it easier to induct a larger number of the aircraft. Financial advisers have also pointed out that the IL-78 fleet currently in service with the Air Force is relatively new as the last aircraft was inducted as late as 2004. This, analysts say, rules out the argument that a modernised platform is needed by the Air Force.

    The Air Force, on the other hand, is fed up of constant delays in spare parts as well as quality issues with Russian built aircraft. The Russian aircraft, officers say, also did not meet all requirements set in the tender. Senior officials have pointed out that not only does the Airbus aircraft have a larger range but also the ability to carry extra fuel along with a passenger or cargo load.

    While the IAF is very keen on acquiring refueling aircraft at the earliest given the threat environment and the need to deploy fighters on extended missions, the Finance Ministry’s objection is likely to delay the final signing of the contract.

    Need of forcesBy: Raghav | 26-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward We trust our nation with our armed forces. But we can't trust their judgement when it comes to selecting the equipment they need! Time and again the institutions of the state have been at the fore front of erosion of our defence preparedness. Be they be convoluted procurement procedures, scam-phobia, over-zealous CVC and CAG...Having learnt bitter lessons in Kargil, with China once again flexing muscles, it is time that the professionals in the armed forces who have great sense of proportion by virtue of their training and very nature of their job to select what they need. Most critical weapon systems are taken away from the reach of forces by whipping scam-phobia and summary banning/black-listing of their manufacturers. It is matter of investigation, if it is just petty partisan political bickering or something of a sinister conspiracy to demoralise the forces and corrode their preparedness by the manipulation of our own institutions.
    The RefuelersBy: G. Dandekar | 04-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The IAF already has 6 of IL-78s. It is The IAF that ordered these before, not the Finance Ministry. These planes seem to be working fine, I have not read of any complaints. These are re-fuelers, not combat planes. Common sense tells me it is much easier to maintain one type of plane. I think we should leave it to the IAF to make their case and get what they need and stay within the budget. While it may be true the Russian planes cost more to maintain, there are serious concerns about the reliability of western manufacturers in times of war to provide necessary back-up. Let us not get lost here in name calling. The IAF on its part has caused many delays in equipment purchases by their indecisions.
    Height of Babudom's blinkered outlookBy: Suresh Panje | 03-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The successful aspirants who pass the UPSC examinations to become IAS officers are branded as the intellectual genius of the nation. Well, they may be so since they crack the tough question paper with utmost confidence.However, no sooner than they pass out from the LBS Academy in Shimla and get the suffix tag of IAS against their names, the entire mindset is changed and it becomes one track minded. All that they know is one short of boot licking the political masters and mastering the bureaucratic language such as "With reference yo your above, I offer my below..." and "I am desierd by Hon'ble Minister to acknowledge your...".As for the intellect of these babus, it is said that once the CAG personnel even gave a green signal to a road roller (perhaps belonging to MES or PWD) being written-off since it was eaten by white ants!In a nutshell, the bureacrats are more concerned of being something than doing anyting.
    Finance Ministry needs to come cleanBy: AK Singh | 02-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The approved Defence Budget is under expended by Rs 6500 to 7000 Crores every year while the Overall revised budget of the nation "exceeds" the Budget estimate by 4-5% every year. The nation needs to be told about the Ministries which consistently exceed their budget every year. The objection by Finance Ministry to the IAF proposal could be a poly to ensure that in the financial year 2009-10 too defence budget remains "under expended" by Rs 7000 Crore.
    Cost factorBy: ravi | 02-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward These bureaucrats and politicians dont have any knowledge of requirements of the armed forces,they always look into the cost factor but they dont realise the real cost in long term.Russians planes are fuel guzzlers and the maintenance cost in its life cycle is much more compared to western planes.Above all the spare parts issues,in the past we had faced several problems with spare parts of the russian equipment.In case of war it is only our brave men in uniform who fight the enemy not these politicians. So the armed forces should be provided military equipment according to their choice.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.