Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

First time, talk of a ‘well-off’ cut-off in SC/ST quotas

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Quota What Next

    Fourteen years after the Mandal Commission judgment identified a “creamy layer” only among the Other Backward Classes, the Supreme Court, in a landmark verdict today, extended the concept for the first time to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes too.

    The creamy layer, as currently defined by the Government, applies only to OBCs and is a listing of several categories of individuals — based on economic and social criteria — exempt from reservation.

    The decision was given by a five-judge Constitution Bench of Chief Justice Y K Sabharwal and Justices K G Balakrishnan, S H Kapadia, C K Thakker and P K Balasubramanyam while upholding the validity of the Constitution 77th, 81st, 82nd and 85th amendments providing for reservation for SC and STs in the matter of promotions in government jobs.

    In the process, the judgment in another first, also upheld the validity of laws providing reservation to SCs and STs in the matter of promotions - a far departure from the logic advanced by it in the Mandal case in 1992.

    Ads by Google

    In that case, a five-judge Constitution Bench had ruled against extending reservation to promotions saying this was not envisaged by the Constitution.

    In fact, the 77th amendment was brought in to nullify the effect of the Mandal judgment as regards promotion for SCs and STs.

    However, the consequences of today’s judgment could be far-reaching given that one of the amendments — 81st, upheld by the court — relates to recruitment of SCs and STs in backlog vacancies. On a strict interpretation, this would mean that the concept of creamy layer would apply in the matter of recruitment of the two classes as well.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.