There surely was a better way to debate airport policy. Planning Commission Deputy Chairperson Montek Singh Ahluwalia and Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel are both instinctive liberalisers, two of a very small group in policy circles. They can have their differences, differences that include interpretation of where one turf ends and another begins. But a public spat that allows speculation that the two may be taking positions that cannot be reconciled is exactly what the broader reforms project does not need. The prime minister, another member of the small group of genuine liberalisers, needs to settle this quickly. Policy battles that turn political/personal have a way of tarring the policy itself. In this case, the potential victim is airport reform, a largely unfinished project.

As for the specifics of the Montek-Praful argument, there are faults on both sides. The Planning Commission is a creature of state-planning days when thinking big for consumer services or products was just not on, the tendency being to plan for shortages. From airports to LPG cylinders, the idea was, people should queue for everything. Ahluwalia is not a policymaker in that mould, but his commission is wrong in questioning the civil aviation ministry’s big plans for the Chennai and Kolkata airports.

India must build for the medium term, and in the medium term passenger air traffic is going to be huge. The ministry for its part has found virtues in public sector involvement in airport modernisation in Chennai and Kolkata. This is in part influenced, as almost everything is in the UPA government, by local-influence peddling by Congress’s partners. All in all, this is a typical Indian government attempt at doing something good, and this complexity is all the more reason liberalisers should work out their differences quietly.

... contd.