Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Forgetting something?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • No other population is so much a part of our lives, whose absence can so affect our lifestyle, and yet is so shockingly invisible to policy as the urban poor. In just the latest reminder of this invisibility, in this election campaign the urban poor — our domestic helps, labourers, street vendors — have received no specific attention, for example, in party manifestos. Even as two leading parties accuse each other of copying manifestos, it is clear that no memorable catchphrase fits the urban poor, neither “aam aadmi” nor “India Shining.”

    When nearly 100 million urban dwellers in India are estimated to be poor, (which is about one-tenth of the country’s population and more than the population of many countries), one would expect them to be paid due attention. The urban poor are part of the colossal growth in urbanisation that India is experiencing; numbers are projected to swell to 200 million by 2020. They remain largely unserved by basic healthcare services. Yet, if we look through the major parties’ election manifestos, while the rural poor are mentioned as a classified group — and agriculture, housing and health concerns have been addressed — the urban poor do not merit dedicated focus. This is disappointing. (One party mentions urban programmes it kick-started while another just touches upon poverty among slum dwellers.)

    Ads by Google

    There seems to be insufficient understanding of the vulnerability of the urban poor and of their health and nutrition needs. Most of the urban poor are residents of slums, many of them unlisted. This puts them beyond the pale of government healthcare services, as residents of unlisted slums face the threat of eviction and prefer to remain unnoticed. Migration and mobility are also factors; cost, timings, and factors like lack of confidence in accessing healthcare services put secondary care and private-sector facilities out of their reach.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Urban PoorBy: M.S.Kamath | 09-May-2009 Reply | Forward It may appear, political parties are concerned about rural poor. They do little apart from having some programmes for them and making financial allocations. But, the result is no different from the utter neglect of rural poor as well. Division of poor as rural, urban, poorest of the poor, landless labourer etc. will serve only as vote banks for politicians. Their plight continues.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.