Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

French Rafale out of race for IAF fighters

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Rafael french fighter jet
    French fighter jet Rafael has been rejected at the technical evaluation stage.

    The French Rafale twin-engine multi-role fighter has been knocked off a $10-billion contract for 126 combat aircraft for the Indian Air Force. One of six contenders, Rafale was officially rejected by the Ministry of Defence for what an official called the failure to meet qualitative requirements of the contract.

    The IAF has been maintaining that all six contenders — American F-18 and F-16, Eurofighter Typhoon, Russian MiG-35, Swedish Gripen NG and the Rafale — for the Medium Multi Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) contract have met technical requirements.

    But a senior official of the Ministry of Defence today said that Dassault Aviation's Rafale was rejected at the technical evaluation stage for failing to meet minimum performance requirements detailed in the tender document. Flight trials for the remaining five fighters are expected to commence within three months, the official said.

    Ads by Google

    “They (Rafale) did not meet the requirements and will not proceed to the next stage. We hope to begin trials within three months with the others that have qualified,” the official said.

    The French fighter, always an underdog in the competition for what is considered the largest international defence contract, was aggressively pushed by the French government. Former President Jacques Chirac and successor Nicolas Sarkozy spoke about the fighter in their interactions with India.

    Incidentally, a separate contract, valued at close to $2 billion, for the upgrade of the IAF Mirage fighter fleet has also been stuck for several months with India and France still in commercial negotiations. While the IAF requires an urgent upgrade, the price being quoted by France for the upgrade of over 50 fighters has been a dampener.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    French Rafale out of race for IAF fighters. By: T.Bose.(F/Lt.IAF.Retd.) | 24-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward For GOD's sake,whichever fighter the govt.chooses PLEASE,PLEASE FINALISE one of these fighter a/c ASAP
    EngineerBy: jaganath | 20-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward It turns out this report may be premature. Today's media reports Rafael is still in the race. Earlier media reports that Swedish fighter Saab Gripen was out of the race also were proven misguided. Anyway, this is as much a economic or political issue as it is technical. I've seen many nations choosing defense equipment on political considerations rather than technical. For instance EU nations Holland and UK chose American Apache choppers over their own (superior) home-made Euro-Tiger choppers. Now they are also planning to buy the American JSF fighter jets over home-made Rafaels, Gripens and Euro-fighters all of which exceed the American JSF on multiple technical considerations. So we see international defence deals are more complicated and complex than meets the eye. I pray India gets lucky and makes the most favorable choice for our great nation. This is the biggest deal to date, not to mention the trust we put in the supplier for after-sales service and supply of components.
    we need missilesBy: Bhrahamastra | 20-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward I think we should concetrate more on Missile Arsenal and making it best and sophisticated than planes and ships because they are an easy target.
    Evaluating MMRCA By: general | 19-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward The process of evaluation of MMRCA by Indian defence official is of high standards. They want to choose the best among the bests. Choosing a right fighter is not an easy issue. There are many issues like performance and technical factors,cost-effective manufacturing and supply of planes and its spare parts, issues of usages, after sales maintenance, costs,govt and political issues etc.Sources said that rafale was discarded for not having adequate technical factors and also for it's high costs.Here a comparative analysis of advantages and disadvantages of other MMRCA fighters.1)MIG-35 :Thrust vectoring ,AESA radar, larger payload capabilities,but russian are famous for cost escalation and delays.2)Eurofighter Typhoon: currently the most capable fighter in europe, but little bit costly. 3)JAS 39 Gripen:4.5 generation single engine fighter made by Saab of sweden.problem is not having any experience of modern Saab fighter by IAF.4)F-16C/D:one of the best fighter plane in the world. Low cost,but the problem lies over the usage authority (Americans want to keep an eye over Indian usages).5)F-18 hornet: very high performance fighter, but the problem is same as F-16s
    BSBy: jaganath | 19-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward Such a massive outsourcing contract for defence is a setback to indigenous industry. Offering $10 to 12 Billion to Indian industries and academic institutions would very easily have led to a 1st class indigenous MRCA fighter and would be a great incentive for Indian talent. This huge contract is already plagued by the inevitable politics. I think Indian industry can make such planes on their own. Maybe not as good on every count, but exceeding on other counts. Creativity leads to improvement and superiority. It's worth a try. HAL already has a design for a top class MCA figher, they deserve a fair chance and perhaps some guidance, but I think the potential is all there. Howsoever..Good Luck.
    20 years and no resultBy: YD | 24-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward One light fighter is in the pipe line for the last 20 years and after 5,000 crore rupees it is still in "initial" stage, after 15 years Kaveri engines are abandond. Indians work only when they are overseas, in India they have no will to work or achieve anything.
    Even 100 years will fetch no resultBy: Alok | 24-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Absolutely. The so called Indian ''fertile'' brain is for software and BPO industry, definitely not in hitech defence industry. If left to India, it will take almost 100 years to produce something like F-16.Ditto for aerospace
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.