Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

From tu-tu-main-main to tu and main

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • People desire to see cooperative politics goes beyond the realm of TV debates. Indeed, it will soon begin to impact the messy task of government formation. It is almost certain that news about the election results, when they are known on May 16, will read: “Hung Parliament again.” No single party or pre-poll alliance will get a majority on its own. There is nothing new about this news, since the last time a party secured a majority on its own was way back in 1984. Barring the Congress regime of P.V. Narasimha Rao, which was a minority government, every single government since 1989 has been a coalition. By definition, a coalition is a cooperative platform of political parties that agree to work together on a common agenda of governance. But what kind of a coalition government will the 15th Lok Sabha produce? And on what basis will political parties agree or disagree to work with one another? The verdict of the electorate will definitely be fragmented, although some party or pre-poll alliance will naturally have a larger tally than others. However, post-May 16, what the people want to see is less tu-tu-main-main and more of tu and main—namely, less of confrontation and more of cooperation among political parties in the interest of forming a stable coalition government.

    It is my firm belief that the people of India will exhibit their democratic maturity in an amazing way in whatever mandate they give next Saturday. They will vote for change, that is for sure. Anti-incumbency, the bane of any non-performing government, will predictably ensure the defeat of the Congress-led UPA. But the people will also teach a lesson or two to every political party to shed its rigidities and learn to cooperate with others for the sake of giving India political stability, which is a crucial need both for our country’s development and security. This means that the BJP and the NDA, which are most likely to lead the tally, will have to construct an inclusive framework for attracting new allies to reach the halfway mark of 272. The legitimate concerns of Muslims and other minorities will have to be addressed in the agenda of the next BJP-led government. At the same time, the new allies in the NDA will have to discard the bogus terminology of “secular politics”, which is nothing but a byword for the Congress-Left combine’s blind and opportunistic anti-BJPism.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Kulkarni- a multi-faceted disaster for the BJPBy: Rajendra K. Gupta | 12-May-2009 Reply | Forward Kulkarni is an imbecile; a sanctimonious, pontificating cretin. He was the architect of Advani’s ill fated pilgrimage to Pakistan to homage to Jinnah. The only reason Advani eventually survived that was the TINA factor; but is a measure of Advani’s capacity for poor judgment that he continues to let this albatross, Sudheendra Kulkarni, hang around his neck. TV debates are about facile answers and scoring quick points. A party spokesperson also needs to know what to say when. Kulkarni is a multi-faceted disaster for the BJP!
    Tu and mainBy: VS Malhotra | 11-May-2009 Reply | Forward Mr. Kulkarni is right when he says that a lot of time is unnecessarily wasted in attacks and counter attacks in debates on political issues. So, for example, when the party presently sitting in the opposition asks the present party in power as to why in the past five years it has not made any effort to bring back the black money lying in the Swiss banks?, the usual response of the governing party will be "Jab aap satta mein thei tab aap nei quion naheen iss black money ko bhaarat laane ki koshish kee?" Now this is just wasting time of the participants of the debate as well as that of the T.V. Channels and that of the viewers. A responsible reply to such a question should detail the steps taken in this regard and if no steps have been taken we should be frank enough to tell the true position adding that the point raised by the opposing party has been well taken and the needed steps will be taken at the earliest and we will soon come back to you on this point. The "jab aap satta mein the" type of respone has become almost universal answer ever ready to be put to use. This must be stopped by mutual agreement. In my opinion this will be one example of the use of the "tu and main" approach to solving our political problems.
    Utopian !!!By: Raju Suryavanshi | 11-May-2009 Reply | Forward For the last two decades Indian voters are in no mood to give power to any single party, however young it is or old. The masses in India have been wise enough to understand the similiarity in planks and non adherence of the parties to it,when they came in power. On the other hand the largest and larger political parties bed with regional parties somtimes appear stronger in their regions.This bed sharing boosts regionalism and a feeling of supiority of regional belonging.The UPA-NDA presently doing nothing but wooing the parties on common dice who have vast idealogical differences,in order to do so lots of adjustments are done and its ultimately creat dismayic situations in the society. Unhesitently given promises about reservation to certain caste creats drift between the communities-catses.People are fed up of this illgitimate bed sharing of political parties. They want parties to be sensible and work on common programm on national develoment.Will BJP-CONG.underestand?Its too utopian.
    Quite PossibleBy: Wilson | 10-May-2009 Reply | Forward If Cong and BJP emerge as two large parties, they can work out to govern 2.5 yrs each. The first single largest party will get to form the governemnt with outside support of the other for half the term. The next half term would be vice versa. But this will be possible if both parties shed their rigid agenda of playing with religion. Both can have a program only for development and leave other things. This way not only there will b a stable govt but will also keep away all smaller parties who have no other objective other than money and power. Try out and shed ur political difference for the sake of the nation.
    Only in dreams!By: Ramesh Kapoor | 10-May-2009 Reply | Forward A very good thought, but most unlikely to be fulfilled. In 'you' and 'me' relationship, who will be the commander-in-chief. BJP/NDA or Congress party/UPA. With all those brickbats and kick-ups who is smarter among the two, thus who can bow to the demands of the other. If NDA and UPA are redundant, past relationships will come to haunt both the BJP and or Congress party. With sychophants in the latter being too strong, and power hungry, they will never sustain such relationship. No point in wasting time in this union.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.