Premium
This is an archive article published on July 4, 2012

Gadgil report,heritage tag not linked,says MoEF

Kerala,Goa,Maharashtra reject recommendations of WGEEP

Even as 39 protected areas across the Western Ghats made it to the UNESCO list of World Heritage sites,India is trying to separate the issue of the heritage status from the recommendations of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP),headed by Madhav Gadgil.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature has asked India to consider the panel’s report as part of the conservation efforts necessary to retain the heritage tag. The Ministry of Environment and Forests has communicated to the IUCN that the government has not yet “accepted” the WGEEP report and the two issues cannot be connected.

Ministry officials have said that the government would decide on accepting the report only after considering the replies from all the six states in the Western Ghats. “The heritage tag and the WGEEP report are two separate issues. As part of the heritage status,we are required to file conservation reports of the 39 sites to the UNESCO every year and such conservation measures will be as per the existing laws,” said a ministry official.

Story continues below this ad

Kerala has objected to the WGEEP’s recommendations of three-tier categorisation of ecologically sensitive zones. Kerala Chief Minister Oommen Chandy met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Tuesday and told him that the recommendations of the WGEEP were “impracticable” and “detrimental” to the interests of the state. He wanted the Centre to junk the proposal to set up the Western Ghats Ecology Authority and allow the state to take “appropriate conservation measures” on its own. Chandy made it clear that the state cannot accept the panel’s recommendation for zonation of the Ghats. The tentative recommendations,he argued,would make development or human activities unable in certain areas where the width of the land is less. He pointed out that land areas next to the Ghats which do not directly influence the ecology or environment of the Ghats need not be put under “strenuous” regulations.

Karnataka sent an interim reply last year and a final reply is awaited while Tamil Nadu has not yet replied. Goa and Maharashtra have indicated that they are not in favour of the recommendations,which seek to scrap mining in many areas,decommission old dams,scrap plans to build new hill stations and so on.

Latest Comment
Post Comment
Read Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement