Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Ghosts that haunt India

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Children can be frightened by tales of ghosts. Young nations need simple fairy tales of perfect heroes and dastardly villains. It is essential for a nation to have an unsullied birth. If the birth is traumatic then those memories have to be exorcised. Later, when the children grow up, the fairy tales are forgotten. Ghosts are just creatures of a frightened mind.

    I had thought India had grown to teenage years with its angst and aggro. But the Jaswant Singh episode tells me that childhood is still continuing. Many want to believe that their founding fathers were perfect human beings and the villain at the birth of the nation, Jinnah, was a pure horror with no redeeming features. When I was a child, I was told the story—Gandhi, Nehru and Patel fought hard for India’s freedom; the fiendish British divided and ruled; Jinnah was a stooge of the British and full of venom if not envy and hatred; he divided India single-handedly.

    Ads by Google

    Fifty years back, Maulana Azad exploded this fairy tale in his India Wins Freedom. He recounted in detail the course of events in the two years preceding the Partition. Most of Jaswant Singh’s account of those two years is in consonance with Maulana’s account. Ram Manohar Lohia’s memoirs about the meeting on June 14-15, 1947, when the Congress considered the Partition, are in the public domain. Gandhi sat silent. Maulana smoked quietly and Nehru and Patel carried the argument for the Partition while the young-bloods Jaya Prakash and Lohia openly spoke against it.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Thank you Mr. DesaiBy: Kabir | 24-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Thank you Mr. Desai for this well-argued and lucid article. You are absolutely right that nations whitewash the stories of their origins and tell themselves fairytales, when the truth is far more complicated. Here in Pakistan, we hear in our textbooks about how Jinnah fought valiently for Islam etc, when in reality he was completely non-practicing and only argued for Partition as a last resort. He wanted Pakistan to be a secular state and not a shariah state. Thankfully as you note most Indians can read books and the truth is out there for all who are interested in going beyond nationalistic myths. All the pre-Partition leaders are in some way responsible for what occured--including Gandhiji, Nehru, Patel, and Jinnah.
    We are still suffering and will continue to do so.......By: ub | 24-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward One of the mistakes that were made during partition was not to segregate muslims and hindus in both the countries. We are still suffering and will continue to do so forever. The situation in India regarding Hindus and Muslims can never get better....we all know that. On top of that Nehru family and their policies have destroyed India. We will remain a poor underdeveloped society even 100 years from now. Look at the garbage around our cities and houses....God may not be able to save India.
    What if Churchill instructed Liaquat through JinnahBy: Amit | 23-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward We know now that Churchill was in talks with Jinnah during that time. What if Liaquat was thus instructed by the British to be obstructionist so as to prod the Congress into favoring partition?
    Ghosts that haunt IndiaBy: BE | 23-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward "When Jinnah heard this explained by Nehru on July 10, 1946, he knew he had lost the game."This sentence by the writer clearly states that Jinnah though a Congressman for the most part of his life had little fait in the Congress leadership. He wanted all the control for himself rather than the consensus approach favored by other Muslim leaders at that point. There were other Muslim leaders(Maulana Azad, Khan Gaffar Khan) who trusted the leadership of the Congress then what made Jinnha mistrust the Congress other than his own prejudice against Nehru, Patel and Gandhi.Jinnha was a man who as an aristocrat(no confirmation needed) never dreamed that he had to live under the leadership of Gandhi(a loin cloth wearing simple man)just as with Churchill; he wanted his own canvas to paint on and thus vivisected his own motherland to satisfy his ambitions.Was this not the same Jinnha who had said,"We will either have a divided India or a destroyed India".?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.