Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Global footprints

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Even before asking whether an IIM-Singapore, IIM-Dubai or IIM-Frankfurt makes sense, the question to ask is one about autonomy. If the Indian Institutes of Management believe that a foreign campus benefits them, why should the government block it? It is good that on this question Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal is signaling a break from his predecessor Arjun Singh’s orthodoxy. Amongst the many facets of the license and permit raj in higher education Singh persisted with was his 2006 decision to veto IIM-Bangalore’s request to set up a Singapore campus. Sibal has been as energetic as his predecessor was vacilating, as constructive as his predecessor was politicking. His latest announcement that the Centre does not have any “in principle” objection if the IIMs want to set up campuses overseas is hopefully the first of many measures to inculcate autonomy in higher education.

    Ads by Google

    Sibal’s announcement comes at the end of an ugly stand-off between the IIM/IIT faculty and the HRD ministry. No matter what the merits of the argument, the spectacle of those who nurture India’s brightest minds haggling for more money was a sorry sight. Sibal ended the stand-off with the IIMs, in part, after agreeing to radical changes. The foremost is increased autonomy for these institutes of excellence. Sibal said that the appointment of directors and board members will be by an independent collegium; the government will not have a role in these selections.

    As it happens, the IIMs are right in arguing that foreign campuses will benefit the institutions. A world class brand, one whose alumni are counted amongst the best qualified, must be allowed to chart its growth path. From exchanges of students to those of faculty, these foreign outposts could revitalise the Indian core. There is also the demand-supply mismatch. Given how many students, in India and increasingly abroad, want the benefit of an IIM education, more campuses serve a larger social good. Whichever way one looks at it — institutional autonomy or common sense — Sibal’s decision to clear the way is a good one.

    Many good returns will accrueBy: Som Karamchetty, PHD | 20-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Once an Indian institution sets up campuses overseas, it is but natural for overseas institutions to seek to set up campuses in India. With cheaper logistics, India is likely to become cheaper offshoring location for quality education. Like the IT boom of a decade ago, professional education can become a good business for India. With about $25,000 current annual tuition in the US, if campuses located in India can provide education at a annual cost of about $5,000, the middle class in the US are more send their children to these institutions. Massive expansion of low cost quality education helps global development. Yes! Mr. Sibal has transplanted right.
    Good business decisionBy: Som Karamchetty, PHD | 20-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Allowing an Indian institution to set up business overseas should be a business decision, i.e. does it make a profit? Secondly, will it enhance its reputation or at least maintain its current reputation. Will it maintain the quality and status of the mother institution in India? Will it be considerate to Indian political sensitivities? As an educational institution, will it do good to India, the country hosting the extension, and the world?
    Autonomy for what?By: Academic | 19-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward I am all in favor of granting autonomy to IIMs. But it seems that IIMs do not have their priorities right, and therefore might find it difficult to compete with many of the global management institutes. Many fail to understand the critical factor that makes IIMs such a big success story - the demand-supply gap in India. When over 100,000 bright students compete for less than 1000 seats every year, the institutions that admit these students are likely to do well despite the umimpressive faculty. The IIMs are unlikely to have this advantage in Singapore, Dubai or London where such demand-supply gap is non-exist or smaller. The IIM faculty do not publish research papers in international journals. To the best of my knowledge, no IIM faculty has ever written a book that is globally popular. The only school in India that has adopted a research perspective is ISB Hyderabad, and they are creating a global impact without having international campuses.
    Govt doing a good job in IIT's By: Vijay | 19-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The government had done an excellent job when it come to setting up and management of IIT”s
    IIMs do not produce enough PhDsBy: Rohit | 19-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Everyone keeps on harping on the fact that IIMs have faculty shortage. They are themselves to blame for it as they don't produce enough PhDs. Low scholarship is an excuse. IIMs do not actively seek out research scholars. Stop calling it an FPM programme first and rename it PhD (so that the successful student can call her/himself a Dr) and actively do more to produce your own nextgen faculty. As for Prof Jha's (earlier commenter) point on research, that is not going to happen as long as you have non-researchers as Directors and Deans in the institutes. The heads have to be inspirational and set the agenda for the team. This does not happen especially in the smaller IIMs.
    Re. IIMs do not produce enough PhDsBy: Researcher | 19-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward I agree with Rohit. IIM faculty is more interested in autonomy and salary than research or PhD students. When even small deemed universities and state university colleges can give PhD, IIMs still offer stupid fellow program. I think doctoral students have to make this sacrifice for the autonomy of the faculty.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.