Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

'Unstable Pak extremely dangerous for world'

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Palinmidimg

    The US Vice Presidential candidates on Friday described an "unstable" Pakistan as "extremely dangerous" in their first live debate, with Democrat John Biden contending that its tribal areas and Afghanistan were the "central front" of the war on terror and not Iraq as projected by the Republicans.

    At the face off with political novice Sarah Palin, 44, ahead of the November election Biden, known for his deft understanding of international relations, warned that the next attack on the US is "going to come from al Qaeda planning in the hills of Afghanistan and Pakistan".

    He declared that his government "will go after" terror mastermind Osama Bin Laden if there is "actual intelligence".

    In the first presidential debate last week, Democrat Barack Obama too said if the US had al-Qaida leaders and bin Laden in sight and Pakistan was unable or unwilling to act, "then we should take them out."

    Ads by Google

    Asked which was the greater threat, a nuclear Iran or an unstable Pakistan, Biden, 65, said "they're both extremely dangerous. Pakistan already has nuclear weapons. Pakistan already has deployed nuclear weapons. Pakistan's weapons can already hit Israel and the Mediterranean.

    "Iran getting a nuclear weapon would be very, very destabilising.... So they're both very dangerous. They both would be game changers," he said during the feisty debate in St Loius, Missouri.

    Biden said while Republican Presidential nominee John McCain was insisting "that the central war in the front on terror is in Iraq. I promise you, if an attack comes in the homeland, it's going to come as our security services have said, it is going to come from al Qaeda planning in the hills of Afghanistan and Pakistan. That's where they live. That's where they are."

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Unstable PakBy: KVSKumar | 03-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward If Pakistan is unstable today, the trend started with their migrating to the US camp two decades ago. Don't forget that the terrorists who destabilised Pakistan was fathered by the US with an immature (then) Benazir Bhutto offering to mother them. Now as a remedy for the US folly, you can offer them another US$ 700 billion and promise to get it approved if you get elected. Howzat Maaaaaaaam?
    unstable PakBy: dilip | 03-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Ms Pallin, Having experienced weekness of Zardari, U have already made Pakistan UNSTABLE.... !!! HAHAHHAHA
    Pak instability is an excuse,reality is something else!By: observer | 03-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward And pray what according to Ms Palin is the solution to making Pakistan stable?Perhaps the usual American medicine-billions of dollars in aid,another few billions of lethal armaments and winking at India's enemy No.1,China when it supplies the squalid Pakistanis with nuclear technology,armed missile with fairly latest rocket technology and infrastructure building,like ports and highways.If it does not work,double the 'dose' i.e. the aid.Pakistan itself has no cash to spend for its own development.It needs all its revenues to bring about 'Jehad' and the destruction of India and its majority community,the Hindus.It is possible that the USA has a hidden agenda like the Chinese to destroy India,the nuclear deal notwithstanding.This explains why the USA is helping Pak with weapons,cash and diplomatic support along with the Chinese.....as also forgiving the Pakis for all their indiscretions.Ditto for the Chinese.Once India ceases to exist as one nation,they will stop supporting Pak.
    Good articleBy: Manish Kumar Joddar | 03-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Good to know US leaders have such an opinionManish Joddar
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.