Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Good, bad revenue

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan
    The first budget of UPA-II will be presented on July 6, and Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee will have to walk a tightrope when it comes to the decision between increasing expenditure and reducing it. Cutting taxes may be desirable from the point of view of pushing demand but not if he worries about the deficit. One thing he can do, and where there is broad consensus, is to remove bad taxes. The basic intuition of economists guides a concept of “bad taxes”. A “bad tax” is a tax which should just not exist.

    An example is a tax on the revenues of a business. In a modern economy, production is broken up into a network of firms, each of which buys Rs 100 of raw materials, adds value of Rs 10, and sells finished goods for Rs 110. If each stage of production is taxed then this yields a very high burden of cascading taxation. This also generates an incentive for companies to do excessive vertical integration, which is detrimental to productivity and focus. The sensible thing in the modern economy is for each company to identify its areas of core competence, and outsource or contract out the production of everything else. This is enabled and supported by removing taxation of revenues, and shifting to taxing the value added. Anything that aids the growth and development of India’s companies is particularly useful in a downturn-hit period. That is why the fringe benefit tax must also go. The FBT has done little for revenue, but is, in a word, messy. It has caused the burden of paperwork on individual companies to greatly increase — something that disproportionately hits small and medium enterprises, which might well serve as the engine of Indian growth and recovery. Any attempt to rationalise the tax system must start with the FBT.

    The third major source of bad taxes can be customs. Integration with the world economy is central to India’s growth strategy. When India shut itself off from the world economy, it stagnated. When India opened up to the world, this brought competition and new ideas, and the country progressed. Every interference with India’s economic integration is inconsistent with India’s quest for high GDP growth. Customs duties reduce competition in India, and hold back the flow of new ideas into the economy. Customs duties, thus, must be levied judiciously.

    Some good taxes should also reduceBy: abhas | 29-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward The editor argues that 'bad taxes' explained must be reduced or be stopped in the upcomming budget speech. There are other areas that should be taken into consideration not mentioned above.The tax levied on petrol/diesel prices should be considered. More than 50% of the price of these fuels consists of taxes levied by state
    india budget - 2009By: suresh kumar | 28-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward You have outlined the important issues pertaining to economy and corporates. however, do not touch matters concerning middle and lower class citizens, farmers and employees at all. such an approach is not justified. kindly ensure all round coverage in your future editorials.
    BudgetBy: Amol Deshpande | 27-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward FBT must go. It is retrogative for Corporates. Also, Government must reduce its non planned expenditure. Fiscal decipline needs to be implemented.Its high time.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.