Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Good idea, bad law

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • M.R. Madhavan

    The Fifth Commandment directs, “Honour your father and your mother” (Exodus 32:19). In the Mahabharata, Bhishma tells Yudhisthira, “The worship of mother, father and teacher is most important according to me...” (Shanti Parva CVIII). The Constitution of India states in the Directive Principles, “Article 41. The state shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision for securing the right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, and in other cases of undeserved want.”

    Following these commands, The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Bill, 2007, which was introduced in Lok Sabha in March, aims “to provide for more effective provisions for the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens guaranteed and recognised under the Constitution and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.” While it is difficult to contest the objective of ensuring a comfortable life for senior citizens, a number of provisions in the Bill may not be easy to implement.

    Ads by Google

    The Bill neatly sidesteps the directive in the Constitution (Article 41), which directs the state to provide public assistance in cases of old age. The Bill does state that, “The state government may establish and maintain such number of old age homes at accessible places, as it may deem necessary, in a phased manner, beginning with at least one in each district to accommodate in such homes a minimum of one hundred fifty senior citizens who are indigent”. Note the use of “may” instead of “shall” — there is no obligation on the state governments to establish these. Even without this clause, there was never any prohibition on them from providing old age homes. Also, one wonders why a Bill should specify details such as the minimum size of an old age home.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Childless senior citizen -susceptibility to physical abuse for propertyBy: Vandana | 05-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward I agree with Mr. Madhavan. The Senior citizen would be forced to reveal the contents of will, and risk the differences that will ensue. But the plight of childless senior citizens would be more than the rest if this law is implemented. When the law says "in possession" of the properties of the senior citizens, law should take care to learn whether the possession is taken by force or by free will of the senior citizen. In the present form, the law may lead to physical abuse of the senior citizens, who will be forced to part with the possession and title of properties that may fetch them more than 10,000 pm. Can anybody do something to get this aspect addressed? The childless should be asked whether or not they are willing for a particular relative to be their caretaker. If not, then the obligations should not be there either way.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.